Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

National origins provision of immigration law

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Identifikator:
1796380105
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-196168
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
National origins provision of immigration law
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1929
Scope:
III, 171 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Statement of Demarest Lloyd, representing delegation of patriotic societies, Washington, D.C.
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • National origins provision of immigration law
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Wilbur J. Carr, assistant secretary, Department of State
  • Statement of Samuel W. Boggs, geographer, Department of State
  • Statement of Dr. Joseph A. Hill, assistant to the director of the census, Department of Commerce
  • Statement of hon. Robe Carl White, assistant secretary, Department of Labor
  • Statement of hon. Harry E. Hull, commissioner general of immigration, Department of Labor
  • Statement of Demarest Lloyd, representing delegation of patriotic societies, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Bell Gurnee, representing National Civic Federation, Women's Department
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary-general, representing the Sons of American Revolution
  • Statement of John B. Trevor, National Immigration Restriction Conference, New York City
  • Statement of Dr. Herbert Friedenwald, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of hon. B. carroll Reece, representative in congress from the State of Tennessee
  • Statement of col. John Thomas Taylor, representing the American Legion, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Edward R. lewis, chairman executive committee, Immigration Restriction Legislation, Chicago, Ill.
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary General Sons of American Revolution, 1227 Sixteenth Street, Washington, D.C. - resumed
  • Statement of Samuel A. Mathewson, University Club, New York City
  • Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States
  • Statement of Hon. John W. McCormack, representive in congress from the state of Massachusetts
  • Statement of J. Edward Cassidy, executive director United States Air Force Association, Washington , D.C.
  • Statement of Maj. Gist Blair, representing the military order of the World War, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Frances H. Kinnicutt, immigration restriction league, and allied patriotic society, New York City

Full text

30 NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 
The Cuammax. I suggest, then, Mr. Lloyd, that you proceed. 
Mr. Lroyp. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, the 
immigration act of 1924 was widely regarded as America’s second 
declaration of independence. But the Nation has not yet been able 
to obtain the great benefits which® were intended. The national- 
origins provision, that vital and fundamental portion which settles 
the vexed question of quota apportionment, settles it in a way which 
is fair to every nation, and therefore bids fair to be permanent. has 
twice been postponed. 
As we see it, those postponements have not been because there 
was anything the matter with national origins or because Congress 
was opposed to it. We feel and we believe, we can show, that those 
postponements have been due to a widespread misunderstanding 
which had its origin and inspiration, or, rather, were caused by 
directly and indirectly what we call “hyphenated propaganda.” I 
I use that word advisably. It is a hard word. I use it advisedly. 
We are prepared to show photostatic copies of documents of secret 
organizations with alien purposes which a long time ago began 
to agitate on this question. 
What we want is the law as it stands. We are not asking for any 
change. What we have got now under this great law is only a tem- 
porary, makeshift arrangement. We do not like it because of its 
arbitrary and discriminatory features. 
Senator Reep. You refer to the 1890 basis? 
Mr. Lion. I refer to the 1890 foreign-born basis, which is now 
temporarily in operation. It is not a thing that looks as if it would 
stand up, because, being discriminatory, it 1s open to violent attacks. 
We feel it will not constitute a settlement of the nestion, and that 
this great and important subject will be a bone of contention, with 
danger to the cause of restriction and danger to the whole country 
for many years to come. 
The Cramrman. Why? 
Mr. Lrovp. Sir, if the 1890 basis is discriminatory, it will be open: 
to the charge of discrimination, and I believe that that is more 
of a load than any restriction law can carry. Any law to restrict 
immigration into this country has to stand up against terrific pres- 
sure, and a law which is discriminatory will have the added disad- 
vantage of being open to the accusation of being unfair and, there- 
fore, it will have two kinds of opponents: It will have the out-and- 
out sort of alien-minded antirestrictionists, and it will also have indi- 
vidualistic and fair-minded people who will say this thing is quite 
wrong as it discriminates against this European nation in favor of 
that one; and the whole cause of restriction will be weakened thereby. 
Senator Reep. It has already been attacked on that ground. 
Mr. Lrovp. Yes, sir. I have a statement, which I would like to 
come back later and make, if I might. But at any rate I have 
speeches made in the last campaign in which the present 1890 basis 
was violently attacked before a meeting of Italians because, as the 
speaker said, that census was picked out “because it discriminated 
against you people.” And the same thing can be said about other 
nations; and we feel that there is more of a strain than the immigra- 
tien laws can stand, to be up against—the alien pressure for anti- 
restriction plus an accusation of unfairness.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

National Origins Provision of Immigration Law. Gov. Pr. Off., 1929.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.