Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1818395479

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe

Place of publication:: Frankfurt a.M.

Publisher:: Marx-Engels-Archiv

Year of publication:: 1927-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1818396394

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-205987

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov

Volume count:: Abt. 3, Briefwechsel, Bd. 3

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Marx-Engels-Verlag G. M. B. H.

Year of publication:: 1930

Scope:: XXIII, 488 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Contents

Collection:: Economics Books

3X2 EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY are halts and inequalities in industrial programs which frequently delay or accelerate the productiveness of the individuals engaged. (See the third principle governing the record of comparative productiveness.) For this rea son it would be unfair to compare an individual’s produc tiveness with a fixed standard or rate. The group average as computed here must of necessity reflect all these con ditions, by being low when the conditions are adverse and high when they are favorable. It is evident, therefore, that the group average combines the virtues of rigidity and flexibility. On the one hand, it serves as a fixed and im partial standard by which to estimate the comparative productiveness of each individual. On the other hand, it is a fair standard to go by, because it rests upon the work of the individuals actually concerned and varies with the conditions under which they are required to work. The method of computing comparative productiveness described does not take into consideration the continuity of productiveness or attendance. For a variety of rea sons, it is desirable to record attendance as a separate item. Every efficiency scheme or system of management has included elaborate charts and methods of keeping attendance records. Many of these have been distin guished by their artistic rather than their practical merits. The simplest and most flexible method of keeping an attendance record is the percentage method. In keeping such a record, absences should be divided into two kinds and only two kinds, those for which the organization is to be debited and those for which the individual worker is to be debited. Among the former must be included all time lost through lack of work, preventable industrial accidents, legal and company holidays, vacations and any

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Employment psychology

Multivolume work

Volume

Contents

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation