Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov

Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov (Abt. 3, Briefwechsel, Bd. 3)

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1818395479

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe

Place of publication:: Frankfurt a.M.

Publisher:: Marx-Engels-Archiv

Year of publication:: 1927-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 1818396394

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-205987

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov

Volume count:: Abt. 3, Briefwechsel, Bd. 3

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Marx-Engels-Verlag G. M. B. H.

Year of publication:: 1930

Scope:: XXIII, 488 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: 1861

Collection:: Economics Books

36 Union) ... The Georgia Convention and the Confe- derate Congress have gone forward in their work, as none can deny, without authority from the people.“ Alabama. „The Mobile Advertiser“: „The Conven- tion has adopted the permanent Constitution in behalf of the State >f Alabama. ... The great fact stands forth that the delegates were not chosen for any such purpose.“ „The North Alaba- mian‘“; „The Convention made haste to usurp the prerogative, and ratify the Constitution. ... It is a remarkable fact, that the substantial, physical force of the country, the hardfısted, hand- ı0 working men, expected to do .all the fighting when the country calls, were from the beginning opposed to the Irdinance of Secession.“ Mississippi. Ähnliche Klagen über Usurpation in „Jack- son Mississippian“ und „Vicksburg Whig“. 15 Louisiana. „New Orleans True Delta“: „Here se- zession succeeded only by suppressing the election returns. ‚.. the government has been changed into despotism.“ In der State Convention von Louisiana (New Orleans) vom 22. März 1861 sagt old Rosalins (einer der Hauptpoliticians 20 der United States): „The Mongomery instrument . . . did not in- augurate a government of the people, but an odious and un- mitigated oligarchy. The people had not been permitted to act in the matter.“ In Louisville, Kentucky, sagt 16. März 1861 Senator 2 Guthrie (Proslaveryman, Finanzminister unter Pierce): das ganze movement sei ein „plot“ und „usurpation‘“. U. a.: „In Alabama a majority of the popular vote was cast against going out, but a small majority of the delegates were for secession, they took Alabama out, and refused the people to have any voice in the zo matter. The vote of Louisiana, too, was against secession, but the delegates suppressed it etc.“ Dein K. M. 7/47. Marx an Engels; 1861 Juli 12. 12. Juli 1861. % Lieber Engels, Den letzten Brief nebst Einlage oder vielmehr die Einlage ohne Brief dankbarst erhalten. Die große Tragikomödie mit Gottfried Kinkel ist zu einem würdigen Schluß gekommen und poor Gottfried aufs Haupt ge- 4 schlagen worden. Sr

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1861-1867 / herausgegeben von D. Rjazanov (Abt. 3, Briefwechsel, Bd. 3)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation