Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsibility of states for damage caused in their territory to the person or property of foreigners

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsibility of states for damage caused in their territory to the person or property of foreigners

Monograph

Identifikator:
1831665921
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-222025
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Maúrtua, Víctor M.
Scott, James Brown http://d-nb.info/gnd/117654191
Title:
Responsibility of states for damage caused in their territory to the person or property of foreigners
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
Oxford Univ. Press
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
V, 67 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
IV. Mediate and immediate state responsibility
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsibility of states for damage caused in their territory to the person or property of foreigners
  • Title page
  • I. The basis of state responsibility
  • II. Acts of state organs
  • III. Municipal legislation
  • IV. Mediate and immediate state responsibility
  • V. Acts of the legislative organ
  • VI. The administration of justice
  • VII. Protection of aliens
  • VIII. Exhaustion of logical remedies
  • IX. Civil war, insurrctions and mob violence
  • X. Self-defence, necessity and rescission

Full text

I= 
MEDIATE AND IMMEDIATE STATE RESPONSIBILITY 
(a) The cases of responsibility arising out of the acts or omissions of 
governmental organs and public officials are, of course, the most numerous 
in international jurisprudence. There are considerable differences in the 
practices of the various governments and in the decisions of the arbitrators 
and mixed claims commissions. It would be well to consider: first, cases 
involving responsibility for acts of competent officials who have discharged 
their duties in pursuance of the law; or have exceded their authority; or in 
any way infringed the provisions of the municipal law to the detriment of 
alien subjects; second, acts which are not within the scope of official duty, 
but personal acts which involve, therefore, merely personal responsibility of 
the officer under the municipal law; third, cases of the same nature as the 
last mentioned ones, but which, by their characteristics or apparent relation- 
ship to the functions of public office, may be similar, under certain circum- 
stances, to public acts proper; fourth, cases in which there is no bad faith 
on the part of the government officials, or in respect of which the national 
authorities have adopted proper measures, and the State is thus relieved of 
all responsibility ; and fifth, finally, all cases of common responsibility which 
assume international character through the fault of the State or denial of 
administrative justice. 
(b) Responsibility might also arise directly between two States. These 
cases come up, for instance, in territorial encroachments; or violation of 
treaty provisions; or disregard for the rights of a neutral State; or lack 
of due respect to diplomatic organs; and, generally speaking, in all cases in 
which the injury has not been inflicted upon individuals, but upon the foreign 
community as an entity, or in its national character as a member of the 
Family of Nations. International jurisprudence has, indeed, numerous 
cases involving this type of responsibility, which is termed “immediate 
responsibility”, because the facts upon which it is based establish, at the 
onset, a question between two powers. A distinction has to be drawn, how- 
ever, between immediate and objective responsibility. It does not arise out 
of all injurious acts. There are instances in international procedure in
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsibility of States for Damage Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners. Oxford Univ. Press, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.