Agricultural relief: Agricultural relief

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1831932415

Document type:: Multivolume work

Title:: Agricultural relief

Place of publication:: Washington

Publisher:: Gov. Pr. Off.

Year of publication:: 1928

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 183193440X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-232093

Document type:: Volume

Title:: Agricultural relief

Volume count:: Pt. 3

Place of publication:: Washington

Publisher:: Gov. Pr. Off.

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: III S., S. 181 - 253

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Statement of hon. J. Kehoe, representing Burley Burley Tobacco growers cooperative association, Maysville, Ky.

Collection:: Economics Books

200 AGRICULTURAL RELIEF it was not an interference with the Constitution; and I therefore have no doubt in the world as to the constitutionality of this law— none. Mr. Apkins. I do not think you quite get my point. Mr. Kenoge. I got your point. Mr. Apkins. I will put it another way. I think I see Doctor Aswell's point, that he feels we have no particular justification nor Io doing poh for {an frimner, ad 1 think Doctor Aswell is just as honest in his views as I am, when we know we are utting a law up that the President will veto and when we know, as he is satisfied in Is mind, that Congross can not pass it aver is veto. e point I had in mind was this, at Congress would be justified in putting this lu up to the Fred Factory. without the ; e fee; that it was satisfactory without the fee; that Congress would be justified in putting it up od him with the foe, when oe is the Satan controverted question peiwess the resentatives 0 e country and the Executive. th President is positive in his views which he must be, that it is ancon stitutional, the chances are if you knocked out one section of this ate Te that i fs presumed ho. would his feat utional, an at 1t is presumed he wou sign it without it, and that hey feels a that would Jeliore the farmer, Congress wou ave the right to presume that he would sign jae iil Jit it in, because that feature would be in here anyhow, and Jip auld go on and relieve the farmer, as he presumably sees it from Oss pol it; m oil er words, the Congress is fully justified in put- g up > him that way, and in the event that he 1s right that it 1s uncons user a comes out and functions according to waht is p ’ a Jo e his idea, and if it is constitutional we go on with it, as Mr. Beno, I take the position that, as I stated before, the com- a Doo the : ember ot Congress comes from his people and not from ey A 2 e nuted States, and he should perform his duties ng t ea of what is best for his people and not according to what some other official says. A government is not just og gation of office holders for the purpose of tinuing J anion. That is but the means to the end Th “ond is th an Org welfare and benefit of the people ‘Th 0 end 1s the happmess and UT d ple. at 1s what we are striving at; anc do not care about the veto. I never s thi plished yet in fear and trembling Tw ne Shgunng neg, tho sari as T wort oa. tret ing. I would go against the veto just Ther i oo ould go against anything else, if I thought I was right. the United ys a way to do a righteous thing, and the President of e United States or no other man can stop it—h i porarily, but this fight will d P e may stop 1t tem- kind of a bill, or som CQ £0 on ang some President will sign this serving those people to i will put it over his head, thereby living on the farm m they owe a chance to make a decent Mr. Apkins. I thi there DKINS. I think you have made yourself plain on that. But s one other point I want to get back : and I understand the chai get back to. [Laughter] I yielded, one other thing I want t airmen has not shut me off yet. There is the gentleman from Texas Pre mn the record In conjunction with what 1s this, regarding the CAA but was Interrupted, and that ~ l'introduced SC 0 the rooord, hat at bu session of Congress, and I think I put e floor of the House. that I considered it a

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Agricultural relief (Pt. 3)

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation