Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

PROBLEMS OF TAX BURDEN 283 
although they represented only 45.3%, of the population of 
the state. The per capita levy was $1.34, an amount exactly 
twice as large as the per capita levy for the state. One out 
of every thirteen to fourteen persons was assessed for the 
personal income tax in the group I counties. 
Group II comprises eight counties in which cities of 
moderate size are located. The counties in this group ac- 
counted for 4.3%, of the total personal income taxes levied 
and 5.79% of the incomes assessed in the state, and the aver- 
age levy was $13.40. However, group II accounted for 8% 
of the population of the state, and only one out of every 
thirty-six to thirty-seven of the population of these counties 
was assessed for the tax. The per capita levy for group II 
was $0.36. 
Group III, or all other counties, accounted for 46.7%, of 
the population, 5.8% of the personal income taxes levied, and 
8.49, of the total number of incomes assessed in the state. 
Only 11,440 personal incomes were assessed in this group. 
For the state as a whole, personal income taxes were levied 
on 135,577 incomes. The average tax levied was $17.75, 
and the per capita levy was $0.67. Dividing the estimated 
population of the state by the number of incomes assessed, 
it is found that one out of every twenty-six to twenty-seven’ 
persons was assessed for the income tax. 
Table 87 shows both the personal and corporation income 
tax data by counties and sections of the state for 1928. The 
per capita corporation levies are not shown separately, but 
they can be obtained with a considerable degree of accuracy 
by deducting the per capita personal levies from the per 
capita total levies. This table indicates extreme variations 
in personal, corporation, and total income tax levies. For 
example, in Dallas County there were no income tax levies 
of any kind, and in Hickory County the total income tax 
levies amounted to $30.09, a negligible amount whether 
considered absolutely or on a per capita basis. In four coun- 
ties, Carter, Ozark, Taney, and Camden, the per capita 
levy was only $0.01. 
i In calculations of this kind, it is not possible to eliminate the incomes of de- 
-eased persons and incomes from trusts that are assessed for the personal income 
ray
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

The Fiscal Problem in Missouri. National Industrial Conference Board, Inc., 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.