Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

290 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI 
For the eleven southern counties as a group, the personal 
income taxes levied amounted to only $3,207, and the cor- 
poration levies were only $1,999. On a per capita basis, the 
personal income taxes levied were $0.02, and the total income 
taxes levied amounted to only $0.04. The southeastern 
counties as a group ranked next to last in per capita personal 
and total levies, the respective amounts being $0.07 and 
$0.11. Similar comparisons for other sections of the state 
might be made, but they would add little to the value of the 
interpretation. The analysis of the data presented indicates 
the following conclusions: (1) that the per capita income 
taxes levied are larger in those counties in which there is a 
considerable urban population; (2) that the poorer counties 
of the state contribute almost negligible amounts to the 
total receipts from the tax; (3) that the total corporation 
income taxes are paid very largely by the comparatively few 
counties of the state in which the larger cities of the state 
are located; and (4) that, considering all counties in the 
state, the Missouri income tax is very largely an urban tax. 
TrE Tax BurDEN oN CORPORATIONS 
Various studies have been published from time to time in 
which attempts have been made to compare the taxes paid 
by corporations in a number of states or to analyze the taxes 
paid by corporations engaged in different lines of enterprise 
in a single state. The data most frequently used are the 
total federal, state, and local taxes paid, taxes paid other 
than the federal income’ tax, and the net income before 
payment of taxes other than the federal income tax, as well 
as the net income after payment of all taxes. The data used 
are obtained from the federal income tax returns. In a 
recent study, for example, it was pointed out that on the 
basis of these data the federal, state, and local tax burden 
on Missouri corporations for the year 1926 was equivalent 
to 38% of the net profits remaining after the payment of 
taxes, and that of a group of eight comparable states only 
two. Kansas and Illinois. showed a smaller ratio than Mis- 
! Foreign corporations are assessed in the assessing jurisdiction in which their 
principal place of business or agency within the state is located.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Das Kommunale Wahlrecht. Buchh. Vorwärts, 1911.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.