Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

The fiscal problem in Missouri

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: The fiscal problem in Missouri

Monograph

Identifikator:
1833271335
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-230042
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
The fiscal problem in Missouri
Place of publication:
New York
Publisher:
National Industrial Conference Board, Inc.
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
xvi, 359 S.
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • The fiscal problem in Missouri
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. State and local expenditures
  • Chapter II. State and local indebtedness
  • Chapter III. The Missouri tax system
  • Chapter IV. State and local tax revenues
  • Chapter V. Tax administration
  • Chapter VI. Tax administration ( Continued)
  • Chapter VII. The farm tax problem in Missouri
  • Chapter VIII. Public school finance
  • Chapter IX. Financing the capital requirements of the State
  • Chapter X. Problems of tax burden
  • Chapter XI. Sources of additional revenue
  • Chapter XII. Other aspects of the Missouri fiscal problem
  • Chapter XIII. General summary

Full text

PROBLEMS OF TAX BURDEN 291 
souri! It was indicated also that the ratio for Missouri was 
approximately the same as that for all corporations in the 
United States. If the total taxes paid by Missouri corpora-~ 
tions amounted to $0.38 for every $1.00 of net income re- 
maining after the payment of taxes, it follows that taxes 
were equivalent to approximately 27.5%, of net income before 
the payment of any taxes” It was pointed out that the 
returns used were those from Missouri, and in the discussion 
that follows emphasis will be placed upon this limitation, as 
well as other limitations. 
There are sound objections to the use of the combined 
data from the federal income tax returns for the purpose of 
interstate comparisons of corporation taxes paid or corpora- 
tion tax burdens. These objections seem to be so significant 
that it is doubtful that any conclusion reached on the basis 
of a comparative analysis of the combined data for all cor- 
porations or all corporations in a given class can be given 
much weight. In the first place, the returns from Missouri 
include property taxes and other taxes paid on account of 
branches and business done in other states. The data are 
particularly unreliable for the purpose of indicating corpora- 
tion tax burdens in Missouri, as compared with other states, 
for the reason that both St. Louis and Kansas City are 
located on the borders of the state and a number of corpora- 
tions have extensive properties in other states. The result 
is that the state and local taxes which are used for Missouri 
in making comparisons of this kind include large amounts of 
property taxes paid not only in adjoining states but in states 
a considerable distance from Missouri. If it could be shown 
that the taxes paid by corporations reporting from other 
states on account of properties owned and business done in 
Missouri offset the taxes paid in other states by corporations 
reporting from Missouri, the validity of the data would be 
greatly enhanced. Any assumption of this kind, however, is 
largely conjectural. 
Another objection to the use of the data as indicated re- 
lates to the assumption that the ratio as computed from the 
combined income and tax data is typical. It is true that the 
1 The Taxation System of Missouri, 1929, p. 31. 
That is. $0.38 divided by $0.38 plus $1.00, or $1.38, equals 27.5%.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Neuere Zeit. Heyfelder, 1906.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.