Die nach dem Invaliditäts- und Altersversicherungsgesetze versicherten Personen

Bibliographic data

Multivolume work

Identifikator:: 1818395479

Document type:: Multivolume work

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe

Place of publication:: Frankfurt a.M.

Publisher:: Marx-Engels-Archiv

Year of publication:: 1927-

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:: 184104282X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-239451

Document type:: Volume

Author:: Marx, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118578537; Engels, Friedrich http://d-nb.info/gnd/118530380

Title:: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels 1868-1883 / [hrsg. von D. Rjazanov]

Volume count:: Abt. 3, Briefwechsel, Bd. 4

Place of publication:: [Frankfurt a.M.]

Publisher:: [Marx-Engels-Archiv]

Year of publication:: 1931

Scope:: XVI, 759 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Multivolume work

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Der Briefwechsel zwischen Marx und Engels. 1868-1883

Collection:: Economics Books

il n 1S (e > 2 3 ea re [11 "0 re \ it ir a i apr 1e )- n he {- 1- n SPATIAL RELATIONS OF SOCIAL FORMS 149 lations between diplomats elsewhere than in those between war comrades. Another instance of sociological delimitation is found in the case of associations which have different kinds of members participating to different extents in the duties and benefits of the organization. The distinction between those that are full members and those that are not signifies that there is a boundary line between the latter and the totality to which they none the less belong. Within the group, this boundary marks certain points along the cen- tripetal lines of rights and duties, indicating the limit which exists for the participation of some but not of others. Within the personality of the member, that limit signifies the boundary between the part of his individuality that falls within and the part that falls outside of the relation- ship. The difference between the two kinds of participation is not so much a difference in intensity as a difference in extent. The person who is not a full member has rights and duties which are carefully specified and relatively in- dependent of the life of the group as well as of his own fate. For the full member, a similar separation between his own individual life and that of the whole is not made. He par- takes with the whole of his personality in the total life of the group, and that which will be required of him or which will be due him cannot be stipulated in advance. The delimitation of the participation of certain mem- bers through a specific determination of their rights and duties gives to their relations to the group as a whole an objective character. The objective character of the social relations of modern times is due largely to such limitation of the individual participation. In the Middle Ages the group claimed the whole of the individual, but stood as a whole behind him in mutual solidarity. In modern groups,

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Die nach dem Invaliditäts- und Altersversicherungsgesetze versicherten Personen

Multivolume work

Volume

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation