Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods

Monograph

Identifikator:
1848834152
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-240944
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
His Majesty's Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1930
Scope:
119 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • A survey of the trade in rubber manufactured goods
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Comparison of the statistics of different countries
  • III. Characteristics of the rubber industry
  • IV. Growth of the rubber manufacturing industry
  • V. Absorption in rubber in different countries
  • VI. Use of rubber in different branches of the Industry
  • VII. Reclaimed rubber
  • VIII. Motor tyre industry
  • IX. The mechanical rubber goods industry
  • X. The rubber footwear industry
  • XI. Rubber soles and heels
  • XII. Other rubber manufactures
  • XIII. The export trade of France in rubber manufactured goods
  • XIV. Summary of the foregoing analysis of export trades
  • XV. The industry in the United Kingdom
  • XVI. The industry in Canada
  • XVII. The industry in Australia
  • XVIII. The industry in other parts of the British Empire
  • XIX. The industry in the United States
  • XX. The industry in France
  • XXI. The industry in Germany
  • XXII. The industry in Japan
  • XXIII. The industry in Italy
  • XXIV. The industry in Belgium
  • XXV. Need for more uniform statistics
  • XXVI. Technical skill and labour
  • XXVII. Standardisation
  • XXVIII. Minimum prices - standard costing system
  • XXIX. Research
  • XXX. Tendencies in the rubber industry

Full text

19 
: 
} 
5 
3 0 
5 — 
i 
i» 
J —- 
Q 
NN 
joy, 
NY 
KR 
m 
i 
> 
oh 
N 
oO 
triction, 
7 1921, stocks of raw rubber were heavy and relief seemed remote. 
United Kingdom Government had during 1920 been asked to regulate 
ments of rubber from Malaya and from Ceylon. State action was 
|. rst refused. But, in 1921, affairs in the Malay States were approaching 
feral crisis. Rubber was selling below. the cost .of production and the 
“market was depressed. Government revenues were dwindling; large 
1 ‘ons of the native population were faced with unemployment and ruin; 
tes were reaching the end of their financial resources. An American 
lcial combine, with a capital of £50,000,000, had been formed to buy 
tes at knock-out prices as opportunity offered. These dangers were 
ted by the introduction of the Stevenson Scheme. 
TeE STEVENSON SoHEME.* 
goal 
00 
- 
eH 
51 
wh 
i 
It 
—= 
oO 
= 
0 
oO 
Co) 
OQ 
N) 
=] 
— 
0 
J 
JD 
~~ 
> 
~ 
0 
0 
+ 
om 
0 
e scheme established a minimum rate of export duty, and at the 
time provided that a duty rising to prohibitive rates should be 
sed on total exports if they exceeded the amount fixed in accordance 
the scheme. ' The scheme pivoted on a London price of 1s. 8d. a Ib. 
‘aw rubber, which permitted estates to be maintained in good order 
a moderate profit to the plantation owner. The Dutch refused to 
into the scheme, but the British estates in the Dutch East Indies— 
senting 25 to 30 per cent. of the output of the Dutch East Indies— 
iarily agreed to regulate their exports according to the scheme, if 
tre compulsorily applied in Malaya and Ceylon. Growers in Sarawak, 
bo and Southern India also agreed to a scheme of voluntary restriction. 
br the Stevenson scheme the productive capacity of each estate was 
ted by Committees in the East. This assessment, known as ‘ standard 
hetion,” gave originally a fair idea of the productive capacity of 
Istate on a moderately liberal system of tapping, and the assessments 
annually revised, The percentage of the ‘standard production 
each estate coyld export on payment of the minimum rate of export 
during any quarter was to be regulated by the average price of 
ndard quality, smoked sheet,”” in the London market during the 
ous quarter. The initial percentage was fixed at 60, that is, for the 
quarter in which the scheme was in operation, each estate was allowed 
port, at the minimum rate of duty, 60 per cent. of its * standard 
jogton, It was laid down in the scheme that if the average price 
bber were 1s. 3d, a lb. or over during any quarter, the percentage 
+; ‘could be exported at the minimum rate in the following quarter 
be increased by 5, If the price were 1s. 6d. or over, the percentage 
t be increased by 10. If the percentage was over 65 and the price 
«f ander 1s. 3d. but over 1s. the percentage in the following quarter 
| drop by 5 until it got down to 60 per cent., but the percentage 
> not fall below 60 unless the price fell to less than 1s. a lb. But 
1. price fell below 1s., no matter what the percentage for that quarter 
’ ie bercentage for the following quarter dropped to 55. This particular 
0 never came into force, The percentage rose to 65 during the 
| quarter of the operation of the scheme, and then again fell to 60 
[ereained at that figure for a year. In the May-July quarter, 1924, 
er, the price was below 1s., the percentage was reduced to 55, 
hereafter under the scheme it could fall by 5 each quarter until the 
got over ls. 34d. 
© Report of a Committee appoj i i i : 
© Repo ppointed fo investigate the Rubber Situation in 
x i ones and Protectorates—Cmd. 1678, and Supplementary Report— 
> 
0 
Q 
© 
Joy 
ry
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Ernährungswirtschaftliche Gegenwartsprobleme in Österreich. Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1919.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What color is the blue sky?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.