Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Deutsche Geschichte (Bd. 5, Hälfte 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Deutsche Geschichte (Bd. 5, Hälfte 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1892063557
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015
Title:
Deutsche Geschichte
Place of publication:
Berlin
Publisher:
Gaertner
Year of publication:
1891-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1892065975
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236173
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Lamprecht, Karl http://d-nb.info/gnd/118569015
Title:
Deutsche Geschichte
Volume count:
Bd. 5, Hälfte 1
Place of publication:
Berlin
Publisher:
Gaertner
Year of publication:
1894
Scope:
XIII, 358 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Zweites Kapitel. Weiterbildung der religiösen Ideen, soziale Revolution
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Agricultural relief
  • Agricultural relief (Pt. 6)
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

136 
AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 
Mr. Fort. I agree with you on that, but it would also be difficult 
for the board to determine anything of that sort under the Haugen 
bill. It would be just as difficult under one bill as the other, would 
it not? 
Mr. Kivcore. Well, I think it might; and I am wondering if we 
could not simplify the situation by this—that is, possibly this is what 
is in your mind; this is what is in my mind. I stated that my thought 
about the loan bills was that the board would begin to operate at a 
lower point—— 
Mr. Fort. I know you did. 
Mr. KiLGorE (continuing). Than they would under the McN ary- 
Haugen bill. I am wondering if the thought that you have is— 
would not the board begin to operate more nearly at the cost of 
production price, say, with cotton, under the McNary-Haugen bill 
than it would under the loan bill. 
Mr. Fort. No; I am not wondering that. I ask you this specific 
question—I will put it this way. Would you favor operations under 
the Haugen bill if you were on the board, beginning purchases above 
a price which you believed to be the cost of production plus a reason- 
able profit to efficient producers? 
Mr. KiLgorE. I do not think the board under the McNary- 
Haugen bill would begin to operate above the cost of production, 
but at some point under the cost of production. 
Mr. Fort. Then the power exists under the Crisp bill to begin 
operations just where you think that the Haugen bill board would 
begin operating, does it not? 
Mr. Kincore. I think that might be possible. 
Mr. Fort. I am just asking you. The power is there. 
Mr. KirLgore. I think under the particular provision that you are 
speaking of; yes. But if we go to the other two provisions—— 
Mr. Fort. All right. We will come to those later. We are talking 
purchases only now. 
Mr. KiLGorE. Yes; but the provision I am referring to is for 
purchasing, too. 
Mr. Fort. Well, I am coming to that one later. I say that the 
same power is in the board to buy at the same price that you think 
would be proper to buy under the Haugen bill. 
Mr. KiLgorg. I think the power would be there: but I do not 
think they would do it. 
Mr. Fort. That is another question. We are coming to that later. 
However, we are operating with the same individuals on the board, 
are we not, and presumably with the same amount of a revolving 
fund, are we not? 
Mr. KiLgorE. Yes, sir. 
Mr. Fort. If the board did use this identical revolving fund for 
purchases at the same point that it utilized the revolving fund under 
the Haugen bill, wherein would there be any difference to the 
producer? 
Mr. KiLcore. The first year’s operations I think there would not 
be any difference. But if in that first year there had been losses of 
money which the Crisp or the loan bill says must be handled so that 
there will not be losses but that there will be profits. 
Mr. Fort. It does not say must; it says every effort must be used 
to prevent losses.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Agricultural Relief. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.