Denkschrift über die in der Schweiz, Norwegen, Schweden, Kanada und den Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika getroffenen Maßnahmen zur Preisstabilisierung des Getreides sowie über die dabei gemachten Erfahrungen

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1748012967

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-186134

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Denkschrift über die in der Schweiz, Norwegen, Schweden, Kanada und den Vereinigten Staaten von Nordamerika getroffenen Maßnahmen zur Preisstabilisierung des Getreides sowie über die dabei gemachten Erfahrungen

Place of publication:: Berlin

Year of publication:: 1926

Scope:: 82 S.; graph. Darst.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

car. 11] THE GOVERNOR AND MINISTERS 157 given in the case of the Transvaal and the Orange River Colony because the powers were given in express words in the letters patent constituting the Legislature. Ibis difficult to think that the words are really needed, but no exception was taken to them by Mr. Blake in 1876 as regards the Dominion, though they have been criticized severely as regards the Commonwealth, as being needless and useless. Tt is true that the provisions seem purposeless in so far as they grant powers already conceded by law, and it is difficult to see much purpose served by their inclusion. Some of the clauses are peculiarly objectionable as they stand. For example, it was absurd to empower the Governor of the Cape to make laws with the aid of the two houses : he was given that power by the royal Order in Council of May 23, 1850, and this power has never since been capable of revocation by the Crown, so that to include it in letters patent, the power to revoke which is expressly reserved, is not desirable. So again it has never been open to the Crown, since the commission granted to the Governor in 1832 con- stituting a legislature for Newfoundland, to revoke the power of legislation given to that body, and the inclusion of the power in the letters patent of Newfoundland is open to objection as they also are liable to change. On the other hand, the provision as to the constitution of the Council in those letters patent is legitimate, for there isno provision of law or constitutional rule providing for the number. In the other cases, as, for example, that of New Zealand, where the powers in question are all given by the Constitution Act to the Governor, the repetition of them is only meaningless. Other clauses are no longer inserted in the instruments, such as those, formerly normal, delegating to the Governor the power of granting marriage licences, probate of wills, letters of administration, the custody of idiots, and so forth. All these matters are regulated by local law, and the grant of prerogative powers is neither requisite nor useful? and Mr. Blake’s advice in favour of their removal was properly 1 See Harrison Moore, Commonwealth of Australia ®, pp. 300 seq. ; cf. Canada Sess. Pap., 1877, No. 13. See above, p. 104. * Under the Foreign Marriages Act, 1892, the Governor has a statutory

Access restriction

Copyright

Contents: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation