Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896934455
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236504
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 1
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
LI, 568 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part II. The executive Government
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Introductory
  • Part II. The executive Government
  • Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions

Full text

char. v] THE GOVERNOR AND THE LAW 263 
therefore briefly review the circumstances under which this 
Address has been adopted by the Petitioners. 
The course pursued in the Assembly with respect to 
the Tariff and Appropriation Bills was not warranted by the 
practice of the English House of Commons, to which, by 
the Constitution Act, it was intended that the Assembly of 
Victoria should generally conform. Here, not only is a Bill 
introduced on the very day on which Resolutions for the 
alteration of Customs duties are agreed to, for the purpose 
of giving effect to those Resolutions, but every exertion is 
made to pass the Bill with as little delay as possible. Again, 
no practice is more carefully observed than that which 
avoids what is called tacking, or the combination of any 
other enactments with the Bill of Appropriation. But still, 
in the case which has occurred under your government, the 
delay of the Tariff Bill, and its union with the Appropriation 
Bill, were exposed to the same checks to which the like 
proceedings, if resorted to, would be exposed in this country. 
The Supreme Court was able to vindicate the right of any 
subject who might complain that duties were levied from 
him illegally, and the Legislative Council was able to main- 
tain its own privileges by laying aside the compound Bill. 
I do not think it would have been desirable for you to interfere 
in any such manner as to withdraw these matters from their 
ordinary sphere, and so give to the dispute a character, 
which did not naturally belong to it, of a conflict between 
the Assembly of Victoria and the Representative of the 
Crown. 1 am not able to say that, in the actual circum- 
stances of the case, you had it in your power to influence or 
control the course of affairs without incurring the risk of 
such a consequence. 
But you ought to have interposed, with all the weight of 
your authority, when your Ministers continued to levy the 
duties notwithstanding the adverse decision of the Court. 
Still more evidently was it your duty to withhold your 
personal co-operation from the scheme of borrowing money 
in a manner unauthorized by law. I say unauthorized by 
law, because the loan itself had not been sanctioned by the 
Legislature of Victoria, and because the judgment which 
enabled you to repay that loan, having been obtained as it 
was, can be regarded only as a form under colour of which 
the substance of the law was evaded. By these proceedings 
the Supreme Court and the Legislative Council were prac- 
tically deprived of the power with which the Constitution 
intended to invest them. This conduct on your part
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.