Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896934455
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236504
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 1
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
LI, 568 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part II. The executive Government
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Introductory
  • Part II. The executive Government
  • Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions

Full text

cuap. v] THE GOVERNOR AND THE LAW 269 
§ 2. MARTIAL Law 
But these are lesser matters,! and the real importance 
of the question arises in the application of the rule to the 
proclamation of martial law by the Governor. In no self- 
governing Colony is there any provision for martial law as 
part of the law of the land, and there is therefore no 
statutory basis on which the proclamation of such law can 
rest. Nor again can it be held that there is any common-law 
right to proclaim martial law : it is no part of the preroga- 
tive to upset the established law of the land. On the other 
hand, there need not necessarily be any illegality in the 
issue of a proclamation of martial law : it would be difficult 
to see what crime would be committed by the mere issue, 
and at any rate, even if conceivably there might be regarded 
as being some crime in issuing a proclamation which might 
lead to serious disturbances from aggrieved citizens, the risk 
of any Court so holding does not seem to be great. For after 
all, the proclamation stripped of its phraseology merely 
means that, in the opinion of the Executive, there exists 
a state of matters in which the suspension of the ordinary 
legal forms is necessary, and it operates as a warning to 
citizens that this is the case, and that they should therefore 
be on their guard to maintain order : it may even be that 
such a proclamation may have effect in terrifying evil-doers 
and mitigating the evil results of their machinations against 
the State. Now the acts done under martial law may be 
viewed in two aspects : there are acts which can be justified 
A curious case arose in December 1910: the Labour Government of 
South Australia found itself faced with a most serious strike, which para- 
lysed the food-supply of the town of Adelaide. The Commissioner of Police 
gave colour to a doctrine which would have allowed rioting to pass 
unchecked, and anarchy threatened. Fortunately the Government inter- 
vened with a correct statement of the law by its Attorney-General, and the 
strike subsided just in time to prevent serious difficulties. The Governor 
was believed to have brought influence to bear in favour of the vindication 
of the law, and an attack—clearly unjustified—on him by the Premier at 
a celebration banquet seemed to lend colour to this belief. The Opposition 
severely censured the Government ; see Adelaide Register, December 17-31, 
1910, January 9, 1911,
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.