Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896934455
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236504
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 1
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
LI, 568 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Introductory
  • Part II. The executive Government
  • Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions

Full text

£10 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [PART III 
Colonial Law assented to by the Governor of such Colony, 
or of any Bill reserved for the Signification of Her Majesty’s 
Pleasure by the said Governor, shall be prima facie Evidence 
that the Document so certified is a true Copy of such Law 
or Bill, and, as the Case may be, that such Law has been 
duly and properly passed and assented to, or that such Bill 
has been duly and properly passed and presented to the 
Governor ; and any Proclamation purporting to be published 
by Authority of the Governor in any Newspaper in the 
Uolony to which such Law or Bill shall relate, and signifying 
Her Majesty’s Disallowance of any such Colonial Law, or 
Her Majesty’s Assent to any such reserved Bill as aforesaid, 
shall be prima facie Evidence of such Disallowance or Assent. 
And whereas Doubts are entertained respecting the Validity 
of certain Acts enacted or reputed to be enacted by the Legis- 
lature of South Australia: Be it further enacted as follows : 
7. All Laws or reputed Laws enacted or purporting to 
have been enacted by the said Legislature, or by Persons 
or Bodies of Persons for the Time being acting as such 
Legislature, which have received the Assent of Her Majesty 
in Council, or which have received the Assent of the Governor 
of the said Colony in the Name and on behalf of Her Majesty, 
shall be and be deemed to have been valid and effectual 
from the Date of such Assent for all Purposes whatever ; 
provided that nothing herein contained shall be deemed to 
give Effect to any Law or reputed Law which has been 
disallowed by Her Majesty, or has expired, or has been 
lawfully repealed, or to prevent the lawful Disallowance or 
Repeal of anv Law. 
It will be seen that, comparing the Act with the opinion 
of the law officers in Judge Boothby’s case, there are two 
important concessions made as well as removing the doubts 
which were possible as to the correctness of the views of the 
law officers : in the first place, the condition of non-repug- 
nancy to the general principles of English law disappeared 
for good; then, in the second place, the question of the royal 
instructions was settled in law as it had been laid down to be 
by the Secretary of State. In both regards Colonial legisla- 
tion was rendered less liable to useless criticism and avoidable 
doubt. On the other hand, the impossibility of the repeal 
* See, however, Eastern Rand Exploration Co. Ltd. v. Nel and others, [1903] 
I. 8S. 42: Globe Advertising Co.v. J channesburg Town Council, [1903] T. S. 335.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the fifth month of the year?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.