Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896934455
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236504
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 1
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
LI, 568 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Introductory
  • Part II. The executive Government
  • Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions

Full text

556 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [PART mr 
seven years unless the certificate was endorsed by the 
Governor and sealed with the public seal, the amounts due 
on such signing and sealing being paid. The question raised 
by the Lower House was whether, the House of Representa- 
tives having imposed upon a Crown grant, or an instrument 
in the nature of a Crown grant, a certain tax or duty, it 
was competent to the Legislative Council to introduce an 
enactment to the effect that no transaction should take 
place under another class of instruments affecting native 
lands until such instruments had been practically transmuted 
into or changed for Crown grants, so in effect rendering the 
latter class of instruments liable to such tax or duty. The 
law officers advised that the claim of the Lower House 
that a breach of privilege had taken place was ill founded. 
They said :— 
We are of opinion that, if in a Bill introduced in the 
House of Representatives and passed through that House 
a certain tax or duty has been imposed upon a Crown grant, 
or an instrument in the nature of a Crown grant, it is com- 
petent to the Legislative Council without any breach of 
the privileges of the House of Representatives to make the 
efficacy for any given purpose of another class of instruments 
intended to affect native lands under the provisions of the 
same Bill dependent upon their assuming the form of Crown 
grants, on which the tax or duty has been so imposed 
by the House of Representatives. It is, we think, a fallacy, 
to represent this as a case in which the Legislative Council 
takes upon itself to impose any tax or duty. It merely 
provides that a particular kind of instrument shall be neces- 
sary to produce a particular effect. It has a right to decide 
for itself upon the form and character of the instrument 
which shall be sufficient for that purpose, and it cannot be 
deprived of that right merely because the form of instrument 
which it prefers is one on which a duty may have been 
already imposed by law or will be imposed if the Bill should 
pass—the imposition of the duty on that form of instru- 
ment being the act not of the Legislative Council but of the 
House of Representatives. We do not agree with the argu- 
ment that the 2s. 64. was not in its nature a tax or duty, 
but the other argument urged on the part of the Legislative 
Council that the House of Representatives cannot, by 
imposing a tax or duty on a particular kind of legal instru-
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.