Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

Monograph

Identifikator:
832922498
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-79587
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index
Place of publication:
[London]
Publisher:
[The House of Commons]
Year of publication:
1871
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (XXIV, 242 S.)
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index
  • Title page
  • Contents

Full text

ON SLAVE TRADE (EAST COAST OF AFRICA). 
143 
Belarab bin Sultan, son of the preceding, succeeded his father, after the Imâmship had 
“ been confirmed to him.” On this occasion also “ great dissensions arose between Belarab 
“ and his brother, Seif bin Sultan, and many sided with the latter.” Ultimately, “ the 
majority of the peofie of Oman met together to confer the Imâmship on Seif bin Sultan,” 
who had prevailed against his brother, and besieged him in one of his forts, where he 
died. 
Seif bin Sultan ruled over all Oman, and on his death the Imainship was given to Sultan 
bin Seif bin Sultan. When the latter died “ grave disputes arose among the people of 
Oman ; some of the unlearned were for setting up his son, Seif bin Sultan bin Seif, as the 
‘‘ successor to his father ; but at that time he was under age, and had not attained to years of 
^‘discretion. Others, again, and these loere the wise and learned, loere for preferring Mo- 
“ henna bin Sultan, another brother, loho was in every way fit for the office. They deemed the 
“ Imâmship of a child improper in every way. It was not lawful in prayer {reference is 
“ here made to the one who leads in the Mohammedan services, and who is also styled ‘ Imâni 
how then could “ he administer the Government, have the control of the finance, and exercise 
“ the power of life and death ?... But as the people appeared intent on this matter, 
“ the Sheihh, Acia bin Soleiman, in order to quell the disturbances which had arisen, pro- 
“ claimed Seif bin Sultan as their Imâm. Subsequently, hmoever, Mohenna bin Sultan, his 
“ brother, teas introduced into the citadel, and the Imâmship was conferred on him.” 
On the accession of Mohenna bin Sultan the people of Rastak urged his cousin Yaarab 
bin Belarab bin Sultan to dispute the sovereignty with him. They were so far successful 
that Mohenna bin Sultan was treacherously killed. Yaarab bin Belarab ruled at first as 
regent for his cousin Seif bin Sultan, hut the tribes subsequently absolved him from his 
treachery, and “ confirmed him in the Imâmship.” 
This arrangement, however, gave dissatisfaction to the people of Rastak, who adhered to 
Seif bin Sultan, and the latter was eventually proclaimed imam, his uncle, Belarab bin 
Nasir, acting as Regent. Mohammed bin Nasir, another uncle, took part against Belarab, 
and, after many battles, overcame him. “ Then Mohammed bin Nasir sent for the chiefs 
“ of the tribes, and for the learned men of Oman, and requested them to appoint a Regent 
“ with Seif bin Sultan. The council was held with closed doors, Mohammed bin Nasir himself 
“ being with them. They proposed that he should succeed to the Imâmship, which he at first 
“ refused, but, being urged thereto, he at length consented, they taking oath to obey him.” 
Mohammed bin Nasir was killed at the siege of Sohar about a.d. 1724, when his 
nephew. Seif bin Sultan, succeeded him. Hearing of this, his other uncle, Belarab bin 
Nasir, laid claim to the sovereignty, and was recognised as Imam by several of the tribes. 
Intestine wars followed, and Seif bin Sultan called for the assistance of the Persians, and 
was present with them at a later siege of Sohar, then ably defended by Ahmed Bin Saeed, 
the grandfather of the late Seyyed Saeed. Alienated from the cause of Seif bin Sultan on 
account of his confederacy with the Persians, and regarding him as the cause of all the 
disasters which the foreign troops had brought upon Oman, “ the learned men of Nehla, 
“ Nezwa, and Ozha, with the chiefs of the Beni Ghafer and those of Maawel, met together, 
“ and conferred the Imâmship on Sultan bin Moorshid” (who also appears to have been 
an uncle to Seif bin Sultan). 
Sultan bin Moorshid effectually checked the advance of the Persians, and was recognised 
as Imâm by most of the tribes of Oman. On his death, which occurred at the siege of 
Sahar, Ahmed bin Saeed followed up his successes, eventually expelling the Persians, and 
reducing the entire country to obedience. “ Then the chief men Oman assembled 
“ together, and conferred the Irnânship on Ahmed bin Saeed.” This occurred about 
A.D. 1738. 
On the death of Ahmed, “ the chiefs of Rastak and others of Oman chose Saeed bin 
“ Ahmed (second son) as his successor. They wished to elect Hilal, as being the eldest 
“ and wisest, but he suffered from a cataract in his eye, and proceeded W Scinde to 
“ have it cured, and died there.” 
Saeed bin Ahmed soon became obnoxious to his subjects, and they consulted together 
to remove him, and to appoint Kees bin Ahmed (his next brother) in his stead. The usual 
disturbances followed, some of the brothers siding with one party, and some with the other. 
Saeed bin Ahmed eventually triumphed, chietly through the energy of his fourth son, 
Hamed Saeed, who virtually became the ruler of the kingdom. “After Ilamed bin Saeed 
“ had taken Muscat (from the opposite party), and his father, Saeed bin Ahmed, had made 
“ over to him all the furls which he possessed in Omán the chiefs of Omán recoqnised 
“ him.” 
Hamed bin Saeed was opposed by his uncle. Seif bin Ahmed, until the latter died. Then 
his uncle, Sultan bin Ahmed, disputed the sovereignty with him, and civil wars continued 
till the death of Hamed bin Saeed by small-pox, about a.d. 1790. At this time Saeed bin 
Ahmed, the father of Hamed, was still living at Rastak, and again assumed the imâmship. 
He confided Muscat to the governorship of his eldest son^Ahmed bin Saeed, and the 
province of Burk a to his nephew, Ali bin Hilâl, retiring himself to Rastak, and so far 
“ neglecting the Government and the people that the kingdom was transferred to Sultan bin 
Ahmed” (his fifth brother). 
Sultan j3Ín Ahmed reigned about 14 years, and was killed in one of his expeditions to the 
Persian Gulf. He left three sons, viz. : — 
Salim bin Sultan. 
Saeed bin Sultan. 
Hamed bin Sultan. 
0.116. s 4 On. 
Appendix, No. S.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); Together with the Proceedings of the Committee, Minutes of Evidence, Appendix and Index. [The House of Commons], 1871.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many letters is "Goobi"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.