Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

United States

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

thumbs: United States

Monograph

Identifikator:
862226767
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-44950
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Hochstetter, Franz http://d-nb.info/gnd/1018825304
Title:
Die wirtschaftlichen und politischen Motive für die Abschaffung des britischen Sklavenhandels im Jahre 1806/07
Place of publication:
Leipzig
Publisher:
Duncker & Humblot
Year of publication:
1905
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (120 Seiten)
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Contents

Table of contents

  • United States
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Econonomic significance of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Historical development of the sugar-beet industry in the United States
  • Description of the growing of sugar beets and of the manufacture of beet sugar
  • Economic considerations concerning the maintenance and growth of the industry
  • The tariff in its relation to the sugar-beet industry
  • Report on the farmers' costs of production of sugar beets in the Unitede States for the years 1921, 1922, and 1923
  • Reservations by commissioner costigan respecting the commission's report on the costs of production of sugar beets

Full text

ANALYSIS OF THE AVERAGE COSTS OF PRODUCTION OF SUGAR BEETS 
SUMMARY FOR THE UNITED STATES AND FOR THE NINE STATES INVESTIGATED 
TABLE 17.—Analysis of the weighted average costs of production of sugar beets 
SUMMARY FOR THE UNITED STATES AND COMPARISON BY STATES, 1921, 1922, AND 1923 
[Per acre of sugar beets harvested] 
Amount by which 
the average re- 
turns to growers 
exceed the aver- 
age costs of pro- 
duction of sugar 
beets 
Capital charges! 
Aver- 
La Equip- Gross Net Net | ige re- 
tor Com ment, i costs, Allow- 
BSE oem (Ol eos Te fh Noatew| Al 
stor! Seed | cial | direct] depre- | ga- | Taxes | B07 OX0/ indie clud- (Bes or | made for 
of | ferti- P° [costs ciation, tion | oats | copiial capital Inter-| 1D |ihosale land land 
sper-| lizar and ost: 20D a oot at [capital dO 708 Star | rental 
ation | shelter charges charges | or Ichargesi °) 2088 land inter- (0d inter: 
Land 0 est on | est at 6 
charges| “oo | ther cap Per cent. 
othe ital em- | 08 Other 
A ital loved | capital 
cap] Fore, employed 
boot pro. | 11 Sugar- 
duction | beet pro- 
duction 
State and year 
ia- 
shine 
pera- c 
ious on- 
ind | tract | Horse 
in- 
irect | 
ahor | 
Tnited States: 
3-year average... 37 [$23.02 [$12.58 11.43 3.39 
19° ooeen) 0.05 24.08 | 11.07 | 1.62 | 4.03, 
1 emceee-n-| 16.51 | 20.25 | 12.97 | 1.32 ' 3.19 
I areconmed] 1049 | 23.971 14.17: 1.8 1 2° 
lichigan: | 
year average... 14.04 1 22.82 | 13.25 | 2.20 [3.00 | 2." | 4.2 
1921 ooooeeeo| 13.92 124.05 | 11.32 1 2.20 [3.071 2.72 | 420] opp 
1922 oeeuveon.| 13.41 | 10.05 | 13.41 2.20 12.33 | 1.17 422 oul =°3 pon; 
1923 TTT 114.68 | 24.051 15.76 1 2220 | 2.33 | 2.58 | 4.32 | .521 2.96 |...___ 
17.09 | 
21.97 | 
a0 
- 
$1.90 
—18. 45 
7.90 
22.7 
—8.02 
23.10 
-2.91 
B. 51 
t 
~ 
HR 
79 fa 
& 
BH 
ho 
year average. . 
10 inn ms 
unas 
17 im 
45 
i4. [4 
,34 
"3 
3.31 
18.41 
"51 
20.98 
14.89 
“5.08 
38.32 
7.43 
2.78 
890 a 
102 © 
16.10 @ 
= 
2 * 
32.77 
Bn 2 
wa 2 
1. Tn 
8.10 
-27.28 
26.97 
31.30 
01 
-15.88 
"2 
~4 
J gre - 
1 
4. 
8 =2 : 
& ng 5 
FE -] 
1 B= 
‘nu 8 
ool H 
9%. 
NOTES 
{a) See pages 33 to 38 for explanation of cost items. 
(b) These data are weighted on the basis of the acreage harvested. In ascertaining the State average for each of the three years, the averages for the individual areas were 
veighted on the basis of the harvested acreage investigated in these areas. To obtain the three-year average for each State, the State data for each of the years 1921-23 were weighted 
n the basis of the total acreage harvested in the State in each year, respectively. In obtaining the average for the United States, the State data for the nine States investigated 
were weighted on the basis of the total acreage harvested in each State, respectively. 3 
@Q The Wk Seiums to growers per acre of sugar beets harvested shown in this table were obtained by multiplying the prices per ton shown in Table 15 hv the yields per 
were shown in Table 10. 
(d) A minus sign (—) preceding a figure indicates that costs exceed returns by that amount. 
a 
oY
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

United States. Gov. Pr. Off., 1928.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.