156 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI
information that he desires, even with the utmost effort.
Property cannot be readily assessed unless it is visible, and
intangibles, with the exception of bank stock, which can be
readily valued because of the publicity given to bank state-
ments, do not fall within this category. The taxpayers in
Missouri who do not report all of their intangibles are in the
great majority, and it is highly probable that a large propor-
tion of those owning taxable intangibles do not report any
part of such property.
Another important factor is the confiscatory aspect of
general property tax rates when applied to income from in-
tangibles. Joplin, for example, has a total tax rate on city
property of approximately $4.00 per $100 of valuation.
Assume that a resident of this city owns a taxable security
yielding a return of 6%. If this security is returned for
taxation, the taxes will amount to two thirds of the income,
provided that it is assessed at full value. It is true that
other forms of property are not assessed at full value, but
nevertheless there is the legal right to assess the security at
full value if it is returned. Under the circumstances it is not
surprising that such a security is not returned for taxation.
Considering the confiscatory aspect of the rates, it is remark-
able that the volume of intangibles returned for taxation is
so large as it is.
Another element of the problem involves the question of
fractional assessments. Missouri assessors probably would
be the first to admit that real estate assessments are not on a
1009, basis. It requires, however, considerable imagination
on the part of the assessor to value a dollar at less than a
dollar. It is perhaps natural that intangibles reached for
taxation should be assessed at a higher percentage of true
value than is tangible property.
A large amount of livestock in Missouri escapes taxation.
In many cases it is doubtful if the assessor is able to make an
accurate count. For example, if, when the assessor calls at
a farm, cattle are at pasture a considerable distance from
the farm buildings and cannot be seen without considerable
delay, the easiest way is to accept the owner’s statement
concerning the number and value of the cattle. The assessor
receives a relatively small stipend per name on the assess-