THE SOIL
195
control, so that none is wasted and the crop is supplied at
the right time. The loss of water and chilling by evaporation
are prevented by a “ mulch ” or loose cover of farm refuse,
or by so hoeing or harrowing the soil that it serves as a mulch.
The dry farmer keeps the surface broken after every fall of
rain until sufficient for a crop has soaked underground. He
then rolls the ground so as to connect the surface with the
water-table, so that the plants may be nourished. This
method was practised in early times and its adoption has
extended wheat cultivation in Australia, beyond the former
supposed limit of * Goyder's Line,” which marked the edge
of the area with a rainfall of 14 inches.
The colour of soils affects their earliness. A black soil,
such as the chernozen of Russia, and the black cotton soil
of India, absorbs more heat and is warmer than a pale soil.
The Indian black soils are coloured by a colloidal silicate of
iron and aluminium containing some organic matter (Harrison
and Swan (Mem. Agric. Research Inst., Pusa, No. 5, 1913).
Some black soils, such as those of the highlands of Benguella,
though apparently promising, are infertile, because they
consist of coarse quartz grains coated by a thin film of
colloidal silicate. Other black soils, such as those of the lava
plains of East Africa, are darkened by the high proportion
of iron and humus; they are chemically rich, but are diffi-
cult to work as the clay in the rainy season becomes semi-
fluid. It is then impassable to wheeled traffic and horses.
In the dry season the soil shrinks and a network of deep
cracks tears across the plant roots and allows the water to
sink deeper and thus increase the depth with these incon-
venient properties.
Soir CoMPOSITION AND SurvVEYs—Agricultural chemistry
in its early days formed exaggerated expectations of the
help it could give the farmer; recognition of the limitations
of soil analysis led to the view that the biological factors are
most important. The most accurate test available of them
is nitrification ; but, as pointed out by Burgess (Soil Science,
vi, 1918, pp. 449-62), it does not explain the differences in
soils or indicate how poor soils can be improved. The
address by Dr. Crowther, an agricultural biologist, to the
British Association in 1923, shows the return to greater
faith in soil composition; he expressed the * conviction