[54
‘INTERNATIONAL TRADE
zation of prices and wages; that, given free trade, the same rates
of wages and the same range of prices must prevail in all countries ;
that the flow of gold tends to make them uniform thruout the
world.
Another impression or belief, closely related to this, is that not
only prices and money wages, but real incomes and the standards
of living would be brought to one uniform level everywhere by
unfettered international trade and international competition.
Hence the uneasiness, even terror, about the “yellow peril”: a
supposed danger that the teeming millions of the East will compete
with the peoples of the West and reduce the economic conditions
of all to a common low level.
Yet it is elementary knowledge that countries trade with each
other and that wide differences in wages and prices persist none
the less. The most striking illustration is in the relations between
Great Britain and British India. Here exchange between two
large populations has been carried on for several generations In
great volume, with rapid and cheap transportation and with com-
plete free trade. Yet money wages have remained very much
higher in Great Britain, and the general monetary scale has re-
mained very much higher. Commodity wages, too, have been
vastly higher. The same phenomenon, less striking as regards
the differences in real and money wages, but more striking as
regards the closeness of the contact, appears on a comparison
between Great Britain and Continental Europe in the period that
followed the adoption of free trade in Great Britain — a period
of about fifty years in the latter half of the 19th century. The
relaxation of duties, to a point almost negligible so far as concerns
the present discussion, which took place in Great Britain about
1840, was followed twenty years later by a similar relaxation on
the Continent. The Anglo-French Treaty of 1860 (the Cobden-
Chevalier Treaty) led to a network of conventional arrangements
between the important European countries, and brought about
not, indeed, complete free trade, but a range of import duties so
low that it could have been no appreciable factor in maintaining
differences in wages and prices. Yet these differences persisted.