A.D. 1689
-1776.
and grant-
ing boun-
Hes on
export.
New-
fashioned
textiles
of silk
516 PARLIAMENTARY COLBERTISM
1745, when a penalty of five pounds was imposed on those
who should wear French cambrics or lawn; a similar fine
was imposed on those who sold it’. Anderson® expresses
doubt as to whether it was seriously intended to try to
enforce such a measure; but it is in full accord with the
policy which was habitually pursued, of giving as much
ancouragement to the native linen manufacture as could be
done without interfering with the supremacy of the cloth
trade; and the facts, that it was amended after three years’
time, and that the Commons refused to repeal it even
when its futility was demonstrated? seem to show that the
legislators were perfectly in earnest. Parliament also had
recourse to another expedient, which found favour at the
time, for fostering the silk trade, an industry which did not
owe its introduction to, but was at all events invigorated by,
the Huguenot immigration. The legislature not only tried
i promote home consumption, but to stimulate the export
rade as wells This whole system of bounties was a most
sxtravagant mode of encouraging the new industries and
gave rise to effective criticism, especially as there was con-
siderable doubt in many minds as to the advisability of
introducing these manufactures at all. They were for the
most part exotic trades, the materials of which were not of
English growth?
The silk manufacture was the business which was
specially cared for; and curiously enough, the new trades,
which eventually attained the greatest importance, were so
far from being favoured that they were positively dis-
couraged. The woollen manufacturers were exceedingly
1 18 Geo. II. c. 86 re-enforced by 21 Geo. II. c. 26.
4 His work was incorporated by Macpherson, Annals, 1. 245.
3 Sir J. Barnard’s Speech (1753), Parl. Hist. Xv. 163.
4 In 1722 a bounty of three shillings a pound was granted on the exportation
of silks, four shillings on silk mixed with gold or silver. and one shilling on silk
stockings. 8 Geo. I. c. 15.
§ Davenant, Essay on the East India Trade, in Works, 1. 99; also Arthur
Young, in Farmer's Letters, p. 17, condemns the pains taken to develop such
manufactures. J. Massie writes with great discrimination on the kinds of manu-
tacture to be encouraged and the importance of native materials, Representation
soncerning the Knowledge of Commerce, 20; Plan for the establishment of Charity
Houses, p. 10; Reasons against laying any further British duties on Wrought
Silks. D. 4.