398 PARLIAMENTARY COLBERTISM
L050 when that party was in power. It is worth while, by way of
retrospect, to indicate the line which had been taken by the
Tories. Though the various points in the policy of the party
have been indicated in contradistinction to the Whigs, no
attempt has been made to show the strength of their
position, and the coherence of Tory policy as a whole.
Their dissent from Whig measures was not the mere
negative criticism of an irresponsible opposition. The Tory
policy had a definite character of its own, and may be easily
contrasted with that of the party who held the reins of
land as power for so long. While the Whigs relied on industry as
the main ip 3 . .
factor in the main factor in material prosperity, the Tories looked to
eoseriy, the land as the element on which the sound political life
and desired of the community depended. They were prepared to protect
its burdens, agriculburists from hostile competition’, but they did not go
further. Their main object, so far as the agricultural interest
was concerned, was to lighten the pressure of the taxation
which fell upon the landed proprietors; they were not con-
vinced that the expenses of government must necessarily be
Jefrayed, directly or indirectly, by the owners of the soil, and
shey had little sympathy with the policy of stimulating
agriculture so that it might sustain this heavy weight.
They had no desire to keep the burden and the control of
national policy in their own hands. In old days the King
had been accustomed to live of his own, with occasional
assistance from the subjects, for many centuries; and the
Tories saw no valid objection to the continuance of that
system. If he could develop a crown domain in Ireland, or
in the lands beyond the sea, so much the better, so long as
she bonds of political attachment were really strong. The
Tories did not share the jealousy of monarchical influence
which actuated the country party in their measures towards
Ireland.
Nor is it difficult to discern a difference in the position
taken by leading men of the two parties, in regard to the
American colonies. The Whigs were chiefly concerned with
building up the wealth of the mother country, and cared for the
colonies in so far as they served this object, but no further.
I Compare C. Smith's Tracts on the Corn Laws, p. 11.
ut were
wot jealous
of the
Crown,