58
A Study of Student Loans and
stronger than the arguments for educational support in general, because
it would show definitely what was to be accomplished, what interests were
to be served, and who was to be benefited. A financial program of this
kind might enable higher education to receive support commensurable
with its importance. The importance of higher education must not be
minimized, for the day is not far off when a nation’s greatness will be
measured by the hundreds of millions it spends for education rather
than by the millions spent for the maintenance of armies and
navies. 29 If business methods were used in the handling of educational
funds and if its support were sought on a definite basis of what it produces
rather than the indefinite basis of “benefits to society” and the senti
mental basis of “loyalty to one’s Alma Mater” the necessary funds would
be obtainable. It would mean a more efficient way of administering funds
and a more business-like way of securing the necessary financial support
to carry out the various purposes and aims of higher education.
An editorial in the Educational Review on “Costs of Higher Educa
tion” referring to money spent for this purpose states : 30
While the amounts of money appropriated or received from private
sources for education, especially higher education, have increased, the needs
have outrun them by leaps and bounds, and accomplishment seems to be
lagging far behind opportunity. It is doubtful whether the Situation can
be possibly met merely by increased endowments and appropriations. Es
sential as these needs are, alone, and unaided by intelligent management, they
will scarcely serve. The economy that is demanded of many citizens in
business and in private matters is no less needed in public affairs and of all
concerns of the public the need is probably the greatest in higher education.
We cannot continue in the vicious circle of constantly striving to increase
academic income to keep pace with the diminishing value of the dollar. The
real remedv must be found in a wiser use of educational funds. Questions
of wastefulness and duplication are not confined to any part of the country;
the need of an economy in higher education is everywhere urgent. All in-
stitutions seeking the support of public and private wealth, especially in this
period of unprecedented expansion and high prices, should satisfy both
themselves and others that their existing means are being used to the best
advantage. Only thus can further stewardship be justified, when financial
demands are everywhere so large and insistent.
2. Proper cost allocation would advance the educational ends of institu-
tions by making larger funds available for the carrying on of intellectual
endeavors rather than having the intellectual accomplishments await the
proper financial support. Intellectual activity and aims of institutions
would be less dependent upon financial strategy. A reversal of present
financial policies is needed in Order that we may realize from the untapped
sources of support for higher education.
3. Such cost allocations would mean higher tuition and fees, which
present a perplexing but not insurmountable problem. Having decided
29 Seligman, Op. Cit., p. 450.
30 September, 1920, pp. 173-176.