MEASURING BY LIMITED IMPRESSIONS
321
4. Positions which require unusual ability or in which
the work is specialized to such an extent as to preclude the
possibility of comparing it with the work of others.
In general, it may be stated that the method of estimating
comparative productiveness is not applicable
where the principle of piece-work rates can not be applied,
and is not practicable where only a few individuals are
doing the same kind of work.
This fact, however, makes it all the more desirable to
obtain an impersonal estimate of each employee’s capabilities.
The piece-work plan of compensation, or any other
differential scheme, automatically tends to weed out the
incapable employees. The very fact that the applicants
selected for certain kinds of work fail to attain the level of
productiveness required by the piece-work rates on that
work, tends to show that the selections were unwise, and
that those workers who fail to reach that level ought not
to be retained on that particular operation. Where there
is no plan of differential compensation this automatic
weeding-out process does not occur. No supervisor can
begin to approach in minuteness and concentration the
supervision which the differential plan of compensation
brings to bear. The employee’s success, therefore, depends
upon how well he can impress his superiors with his
social connections, personal appearance, amiability, and a
multitude of more or less incidental factors. The promotion
and retention of such individuals, as every manager
knows, depend very often upon momentary considerations
and fleeting impressions. In fact, one of the mysteries
of management is the way in which individuals
progress through the various ranks of occupation and
salary. Their comings and goings are as inexplicable as
the traditional coming and going of the wind.