INDEX 267
Length of service, as criterion 39-40 based on group comparisons 190-196
Letter to references 150-151 combined scores 203-214
Linear scales 127 comparison of old and new
Link, H. L. 21, 28, 60, 66, 84, 157-158 methods 216-217
Lipmann, O. 60, 84-853 miscellaneous methods 211-214
Literacy, as disturbing variable 53 Preferred range 191-106
Loss due to breakage, as criterion 38 Pressey, L. C. 89
Pressey, S. L. 89
Printer, duties of 26-28
M Probability that a difference is real 171, 262
Maintenance of examinations 228-232 Pr ghable effor 187-189, at
Mensots % E. 1%: 3s 165 correlation ratio 188
BY 2 Tru 3s 5, 89, 120 fourfold table 188
McCall, Wm. A. 89 meaning of "
. go 187, 189
Mean square contingency 183, 188 mean square contingency 185
Measuring instruments : : multiple correlation 211
see Tests; Rating scales; Questionnaires product-moment 187-188
Mechanical aptitude test 100-101 tank difference 187-188
bi in societies, as criterion 4 x 7 Sortected for attenuation 15%
Mendenhall. G » 60 Problem of selection 3 ff
M zy Procedure 6-9, 77, 159-162, 225-230
erton, H. W. 63 examining 159-162
Metcalf, H. C. &1 se
’ $ hiring 225-230
Meyer, A. 60, 85 research 6-9, 77
Miner, J. B. 8. £ :
! . purpose o 77
Miner, Z. F. 18 steps 6 ff
piischell, D 'S 3 theoretical implications 8-9
4 Te vv 3 9 Production, differences in 220
ore, B. V. 5,193 product-moment correlation
Moore, H. T. 93-94, 105 174-177, 187-188
Motion stud; 28 :
y ‘ : . Profile method 211-214
Motor defects, as disturbing variable 53 Promotion 40-41
Multiple choice tests 08
Multiple step scales 126-127
Muscio, B. 85 Q
Myers, C. S. 84 Quality of output 35-36
Quantity of output 35-36
0 Questionnaires 87, 143-154, 104-106
Objectivity 77-78 characteristics of 145-149
Occupation to be studied, choice of 9-11 definition 87, 143-144
O’Connor, J. 106, 108, 157, 223-224 evaluation of questions 194-196
Dffice overhead, cost of 219 follow-up 152
Jmnibus tests 120 obtaining data 149-154
Irder of merit scales 123-124 uses of 144-145
YRourke, L. J. 35, 80, 114-115, 217
Otis, A. S. 164, 168, 174-175, 201, 211 R
Outhwaite, L. 85
Random method of test construction 81-82
Pr Rank difference correlation 178-179, 187-188
Parsons, F. 20, 60 Rank-tangential coefficient 184
Partridge, G. E. 60, 84 Ratings 41-42, 133, 138-142
Paterson, D. G. 84, 89, 117, 132-134 as criteria 41-42
Patten, E. F. 108 obtaining ratings 138-140, 142
Pearson, K. pitfalls in rating 138-140
172, 174, 180, 182, 187-188, 101 reliability of 133
Percentile curves and tables 201, 207 treatment of 140-142
Per cent scales 126 see also Rating scales
Perrin, F. A. C. 8s Rating scales 87, 122-138, 143-144
Personal history and data 60-62, 145 ff, 103 comparison of rating methods 132-135
analysis of 60-62 definition 87, 122, 143-144
obtaining data 145 ff halo effect 134-135, 138
scores of salesmen 103 how to make a graphic rating
Physical characteristics, analysis of 63 scale 135-138
Pintner, R. 84 methods of rating 123-138
Plant, J. S. 135 Dennison Company scale 129-131
Poffenberger, A. T. 51 descriptive scales 127-131
Postal clerks, tests for 35, 114-115, 217 graphic rating scale 128-133, 135-138
Powers machine 163 grouping 124
Prak, J. L. 105 linear scales 127
Prediction of vocational success 190-217 multiple-step scales 126-127
based on correlation 197-202 order of merit 123-124
