£ THEORY OF STATISTICS.
identically similar throughout the experiment, so that the chance
of throwing “heads” with the coins or, say, “six” with the dice
was the same throughout: we did not commence an experiment
with dice loaded in one way and later on take a fresh set of dice
loaded in another way. Consequently if formula (2) is to hold
good in our practical case of sampling there must not be a
difference in any essential respect—1.e. in any character that can
affect the proportion observed—between the localities from which
the observations are drawn, nor, if the observations have been
made at different epochs, must any essential change have taken
place during the period over which the observations are spread.
Where the causation of the character observed is more or less
unknown, it may, of course, be difficult or impossible to say what
differences or changes are to be regarded as essential, but, where
we have more knowledge, the condition laid down enables us to
exclude certain cases at once from the possible applications of
formula (1) or (2). Thus it is obvious that the theory of simple
sampling cannot apply to the variations of the death-rate in
localities with populations of different age and sex compositions,
nor to death-rates in a mixture of healthy and unhealthy districts,
nor to death-rates in successive years during a period of con-
tinuously improving sanitation. In all such cases variations
due to definite causes are superposed on the fluctuations of
sampling.
(6) In the second place, we have also tacitly assumed not
only that we were using the same set of coins or dice throughout,
so that the chances p and ¢ were the same at every trial, but
also that all the coins and dice in the set used were identically
similar, so that the chances p and ¢ were the same for every coin
or die. Consequently, if our formule are to apply in the practical
case of sampling, the conditions that regulate the appearance of
the character observed must not only be the same for every
sample, but also for every individual in every sample. This is
again a very marked limitation. To revert to the case of death-
rates, formule (1) and (2) would not apply to the numbers of
persons dying in a series of samples of 1000 persons, even if these
samples were all of the same age and sex composition, and living
under the same sanitary conditions, unless, further, each sample
only contained persons of one sex and one age. For if each
sample included persons of both sexes and different ages, the
condition would be broken, the chance of death during a given
period not being the same for the two sexes, nor for the young
and the old. The groups would not be homogeneous in the sense
required by the conditions from which our formule have been
deduced. Similarly, if we were observing hair-colours, our formule
7260