CURRENCY AND PRICE MOVEMENTS 111
at the end of the 19th century and at the beginning of
the 20th century; the rise in prices during the war (and
the fact that in some countries it appears to be in pro-
portion to the expansion of the currency) ; and the fall in
prices after the war.
But this general concordance does not show there is
in all cases an obvious relation of cause and effect ; for
other factors may have influenced prices, chiefly, in the
16th century, the valorisation of currencies at too high a
point, war and famine. From 1914 to 1918 the war may
have given rise both to the issue of paper money for
financial reasons, and, by limiting production, to the rise
in prices. Similarly, the end of hostilities may account
both for the stoppage of inflation in the period immedi-
ately after the war and for the fall in prices consequent
upon a return to normal production following a crisis.
In this case, as has been pointed out, definite reservations
must be made because (1) the fall in prices preceded
currency contraction and (2) it was much more than pro-
portional to this contraction. Conversely, a fresh rise in
prices occurred in 1923, particularly in F rance, when the
circulation was more or less constant.
Again, it must be admitted that at times when the rise
in prices was much smaller, especially at the end of the
19th and beginning of the 20th century, non-monetary
factors such as the raising of Customs duties and indirect
taxes and the limitation of competition among producers
might perfectly well have sufficed to account for the
phenomenon. A detailed examination with a view to
determining the other factors in the rise in prices would be
necessary in order to estimate the probable effect of the
monetary factor—or to discard it. The same remark applies
to the comparison between the rise in prices in various
countries during the last period of the war, but with this
difference that still other factors, especially the exchange,
are partly responsible for explaining the differences.
And so, apart from periods of great disturbance—when
the monetary factor is not alone responsible, and which
are therefore also subject to some reservation—it appears