186 THE AGRARIAN SYSTEM OF MOSLEM INDIA
instead of Sharing; the bulk of the land would then pay
one-fourth, instead of one-half, and it would be only in
villages with large areas of high-grade crops that the
peasants would ordinarily prefer to be assessed by Sharing.
The account does not say that peasants were in fact given
a choice, but, remembering that at the moment the main
object was to attract peasants to desolate country, it is
reasonable to infer that an option was given to them, similar
to that which Akbar had authorised in order to secure
extension of cultivation in the North.
The differential scale of Sharing now appears in Indian
records for the first time, apart from the early episode in
Sind, which has been mentioned in Chapter I. As we have
seen, it forms one of the main distinctions between the
Islamic and Hindu agrarian systems, and the fact that its
introducer was a foreigner is suggestive; it looks to me as if
Murshid Quli Khidn had been familiar with differential
Sharing when he was working in Persia under Ali Mardan, and
had drawn on his Persian experience when he was sent to
reorganise the Deccan, but there is no positive evidence on
this point. How far this method was adopted in practice
is a question on which I have found no information, but the
account I have been following lays stress rather on the
spread of the alternative method of Measurement, which is
said to have become popular owing to Murshid Quli’s sagacity,
and which, as we have seen, was in all ordinary cases more
favourable to the peasantry. No explanation is given of
the selection of one-fourth as the share of the produce to be
claimed under this method, and it is permissible to take it
as a proof of Murshid Quli’s practical statesmanship, that
he should have discarded the dangerously high proportion
which was at this time established in the North. That he
attended to details as well as principles may be gathered
from the recorded tradition that, in cases where the measure-
ments were open to suspicion, he would hold one end of the
measuring-rope himself; and, after allowing for rhetorical
exaggeration, it is reasonable to infer from the statement of
the authorities that his policy resulted in a progressive
increase in cultivation, and consequently in revenue, in the
region where it operated.