Object: The nature of capital and income

Sec. 6] CAPITAL 61 
Nicholson," Hicks, and the “Committee [of the British 
Association for the Advancement of Science] on a Common 
Measure of Value in Direct Taxation.” ® Professor Mar- 
shall says that in earlier years he “invariably thought of 
capital as the whole stock of goods, and of interest as the 
whole of the usance or benefits derived from the use of that 
stock”; * that “when one approaches the problem of dis- 
tribution from the mathematical point of view, there is 
practically no choice” ® but to do so; and that “wealth in 
the form of houses or private carriages helped to give em- 
ployment to labour as much as when in the form of hotels 
or cabs.” * He expressly concedes what is really the chief 
contention of the present writer when he says: “I concur 
in his [my] conclusion that whatever we do with the word 
capital, we cannot solve problems of capital by classifying 
wealth.” ” Yet he concludes, “not without doubt, that it 
is best to” ® base his definition of capital on such a classi- 
fication, purely out of deference to what he conceives to be 
the dominant usage. 
§ 6 
As to popular and business usage, it may be said that a 
careful study of this usage as reflected by lexicographers, 
who have sought from time to time to record it,’ reveals 
the fact that before the time of Adam Smith capital was 
not regarded as a part of the stock of wealth, but as synony- 
mous with that stock.’ Sometimes the inclusion of all 
! In his Elements, pp. 42, 43. 
? Lectures on Economics, Cincinnati, 1901, pp. 91, 244. 
® Report of British Association for Advancement of Science, 1878, 
Dublin, p. 220. 
* “Distribution and Exchange,” Economic Journal, 1898, p. 56. 
S$ Ibid. p. 55. ® Ibid. p. 57. .7 Ibid. p. 50. ® Ibid. p. 56. 
® See the writer’s “ Precedents for Defining Capital,” loc. cit., where 
are presented the results of an examination of seventy-two diction- 
aries. 
1 Originally.the term “capital” was not a noun, but an adjective. 
“‘Capitalis pars debiti ’ indicated the principal part of a debt, i.e. the 
“principal ”’ as distinguished from the interest. This virtually repre- 
  
  
  
  
  
 
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.