Full text: The agrarian system of Moslem India

THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY 143 
advance], they seize their wives and children, making them 
into slaves and selling them by auction.” We must not 
then read the orders as a complete code of procedure, pro- 
viding for all possible emergencies; the reasonable view is 
that they deal only with those matters on which a ruling 
was thought to be required, and that the treatment of 
defaulters was not one of these. 
An interesting provision in the farman is that which relates 
to the residual right of a Contract-holder who was unable 
to cultivate, or had absconded (H. 3.) His right to the 
holding remained in existence, and he was entitled to resume 
it when in a position to do so; but, during the period of 
absence or inability, the officials were empowered to let the 
land on farm, and if the income so obtained exceeded the 
contract-revenue, the surplus was to be paid to the holder. 
This is the earliest suggestion I have found of anything 
analogous to the mdalikana, or allowance to a landholder 
excluded from settlement, which was an important subject 
in parts of the nineteenth century. 
If Contract-holdings already existed at this period, it 
may be said that the orders we have been examining in- 
troduced little of importance into the Indian agrarian 
system. The provisions which clearly derive from the 
fatwas are matters of detail; rules regarding apportionment 
of the liability for revenue in case of transfers (H. 12, 13), 
revenue to be levied on vines and almond trees (H. 14), 
liability of Moslems to pay revenue instead of tithe (H. 14), 
2xemption from assessment of land devoted to the endow- 
ment of a tomb (H. 15)—such rules as these could be en- 
forced without making any appreciable alteration in the 
[ndian system as it had developed under previous Moslem 
sovereigns, and they were doubtless useful to an adminis- 
tration which may have had to decide such questions in the 
course of its ordinary work. The system however in its 
broad outlines remained unchanged, unless we accept the 
view, which seems to me improbable, that Contract-holding 
was now recognised for the first time.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.