338
LAISSEZ FAIRE
of the revenue. During these ten years the Customs and
Excise increased by £1,707,000, or, at the rate of £170,000 a
year; while the increase of the export trade was £15,156,000,
or, at the annual rate of £1,515,000. Let us next take the
twelve years from 1842 to 1853. You remitted during that
period of Customs and Excise £13,238,000, and imposed
£1,029,000, presenting a balance remitted of £12,209,000, or,
an annual average of £1,017,000. What was the effect on
revenue ? The Customs and Excise increased £2,656,000, or,
at an annual rate of £221,000. When you remitted practi-
rally nothing, your Customs revenue, in consequence of the
increase of the population, grew at the rate of £170,000
per annum ; and when you remitted £1,017,000 a year, your
Customs and Excise revenue grew faster than when you
remitted nothing, or next to nothing at all. I ask, is not
this a conclusive proof that it is the relaxation and reform of
your commercial system which has given to the country the
disposition to pay taxes along with the power also which it
now possesses to support them? The foreign trade of the
country, during the same period, instead of growing at the
rate of £1,515,000 a year, grew at the rate of £4,304,000.”
The effect of Peel's measures was to demonstrate how much
the trade and industry of the country might be encouraged
by the re-adjustment of fiscal burdens, but it was none the
less a complete realisation of the principle of laissez fuire
in fiscal arrangements. The taxation of the country was
arranged simply and solely with reference to revenue; all
attempts to foster an element in national economic life at the
axpense of others were abandoned.
Thechange This change could not have been carried through success-
DE fully, but for Peel's care to provide a temporary source of
A revenue, in order to allow time for trade to respond to the
imposition stimulus of reduced tariffs. The particular expedient he
adopted, of imposing an income-tax for a time, proved to the
public what large supplies might be obtained from this
source. Once again its fruitfulness was remarkable. A tax
of this ype? had afforded the means by which Pitt maintained
the struggle with France, under unexampled conditions of
discouragement in 1798. and it served as the source on which
wma
revenue
swpanded.
X Vocke. Geschichte der Steuer, p. 523.