1226 PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA -~ 28
this problem entirely in my previously writings. I have here for
distribution some big mimeographed sheets which show a work we
have been doing at the Oslo Institute of Economics, on the principles
of how to study the interrelations between three countries. This job
was done primarily by a Swedish economist, Mr. Tom Kronsjo, who
has been working with us for quite some time. He uses my system
of notation.
If any of you are particularly interested, I have a few more copies
for distribution.
Prof. MAHALANOBIS, I must excuse myself if I have not got your
point quite straight. There is quite a distance along this table and
nisunderstandings may arise. As I understood it your first point
was this: the politician will not be able to understand a scientific
question. My answer is: of course he will not. If you put up to him
a description of some 450 dependent variables and 31 degrees of
freedom he will be entirely lost. But I don’t suggest that you are
:o put up to him such a system. You should only put up to him
very simple questions, one at a time. That is the basis of the inter-
viewing technique. I am absolutely certain that if you can have a
quite and not too rushed conversation with the policy maker, being
careful that he understands your questions correctly then very
meaningful results will emerge. I am not stating a theoretical
hypothesis, but basing my opinion on actual conversations with
leading politicians including the Chief of Prof. MAHALANOBIS’
country.
Prof. Arirais spoke about the difficulties of constructing a pre-
ference function.
His main point here was that we have many different preference
functions, the preference function of different groups, oi different
persons and so on. Of course we have, I have, for instance, found
in my interviewing of high-ranking officials that the Minister of Agri-
culture will have different preferences from the Minister of Education
or the Minister of Industry. Similarly there will be differences bet-
ween regions of the country and, perhaps even more important, dif-
erences of opinion of what should be done in a group of countries
17] Frisch - pag. 30