Full text: Secretarial practice

88 SECRETARIAL PRACTICE 
that there is no illegality in providing in articles that dividends 
unclaimed for a specified time will be forfeited, though one 
learned text-writer (see Palmer's Company Precedents, Vol 1, 
13th edition, p. 754) suggests that such a provision is of doubtful 
validity. In any event the Committee of the Stock Exchange 
object to any such provision (see Appendix D), and conse- 
quently if an Official Quotation is desired it should not be 
inserted. 
Out of what A form of resolution to pay a dividend is given in Chapter 
Moneys XIV. 
Payable. As stated above, the fundamental rule with regard to the 
payment of dividends is that no dividends shall be paid 
out of capital; a payment of dividend out of capital is an 
ultra vires act on the part of the company, and constitutes a 
breach of trust by the directors, and renders them liable to 
make good to the company any amount so paid [Oxford 
Building Society (1887), 35 Ch.D. 502; Flitcroft’s Case (1882), 
21 Ch. D. 519; Masonic Assurance Co. v. Sharpe (1892), 
[ Ch. 154]. No such payment can be made, even though the 
memorandum [Verner v. General and Commercial Trust (1894), 
2 Ch. 239], or articles [Trevor v. Whitworth (1887), 12 A.C. 
409; Masonic Assurance Co. v. Sharpe (see above)], or a 
general meeting [Flitcroft’s Case (see above)] purport to 
authorise it. 
But although no dividend can be paid out of capital, yet a 
dividend can be paid out of moneys which are certainly not 
‘net profits.’ 
A difficulty has been felt in drawing the line between 
capital and net profits, chiefly arising from the various 
methods in which depreciation or loss of assets may be dealt 
with. The Companies Acts have not required any uniform 
system of book-keeping, and consequently it happens that 
companies deal with depreciation or loss in many different 
ways: some provide out of revenue for depreciation or loss 
as it arises; others only partially, or not at all. Given the 
same amount of depreciation or loss and the same revenue, 
the net profits may apparently be increased or reduced 
according to the method employed in dealing with deprecia- 
tion or loss. [See Spanish Prospecting Co. (1911), 1 Ch. 92, 
as to the meaning of profits]. 
The question then arises whether dividends can be paid 
out of the revenue, or only out of the net profits after taking 
from revenue such amount as may be necessary to keep. the 
capital intact, The answer depends upon the constitution 
and objects of each company [Davison v. Gillies (1879), 
16 Ch. D. 347 (n); Dent v. London Tramways Co. (1880),
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.