MOVEMENTS AND TRADE 119
countries at once causes a monetary disturbance of the balance
of payments. The corrective, quite obviously, is a corresponding
regulation of credit; although a drastic reduction in Britain
tends to have on the Australian system a more than commen-
surate effect. The wider the swing from expansion to con-
traction in Britain, the more serious is the inevitable dislocation
of credit in Australia. For an adequate explanation of the
majority ‘of Australian business crises we need scarcely look
further than to the fluctuations in available bank credit which
are consequent upon sudden changes in credit conditions in
London.
It 4s, however, more strictly to what Hawtrey calls with
doubtful accuracy the ‘non-monetary’ causes of such dis-
turbances that our examination should be directed, since the
phenomena are not nearly so definite nor so clearly expressed
in terms of the trade balance. Non-monetary disturbances
may have their origins in a change in the demand for, or the
supply of, foreign commodities in Australia. More important
still, they may arise in borrowing; or, to be more explicit, in
changes in the rafe at which British capital is injected into the
Australian economic system.
Consider for a moment the position created when exports of
primary products from Australia are stimulated either through
increased production due to good seasons, or through an increase
in the overseas demand for these commodities. The farmers and
export merchants will now become entitled to increased sums
of foreign currency which, by the operation of bills, will bank
up in London under normal conditions, and there await transfer
to Australia as opportunity offers. But the preliminary stages
leading to this result are the immediate payment by the banks
in Australia to the merchants by discounting their bills, and the
settlement by merchants with the producers. The seasonal
situation which thus develops is that in which the Australian
banks in London hold large amounts of Australian bills which,
other things being equal, would tend to upset the equilibrium
of the exchange. But nothing of the sort normally happens.
For, meanwhile, the producer will be expending his income
partly on investment, and partly on consumption goods which
may be either foreign-trade goods such as American motor-cars,
home-trade goods such as boots, or either foreign- or home-