CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF
Furthermore, they are quite definitely associated with the
completion of spasmodic expansion periods. They mark, as it
were, the pauses between the beats in the growth rhythm of the
country. And they are just as demonstrably associated with
some disproportion between the two active agents in production,
or with some circumstance which interfered with the steady
and regular co-operation of labour and capital in the work of
Australian development. The periods marked by the advance to
self-government from 1820 to 1840, the activity in South Austra-
lia associated with the Wakefield scheme, the credit inflation
following the gold discoveries after 1851, the mining boom from
1860 to 1873, Queensland development after 1866, the Victorian
‘land boom’ of 1890, the buoyancy due to the high produc-
tivity of the years following 1906, the expansion of secondary
industries, especially after 1912, and the post-war boom and
depression are usually accepted as well-defined business cycles
in Australia. These periods, too, have been marked by popula-
tion growth; and the well-marked migration phases connected
with all of them are regarded as another usual function of the
business cycle which is common to all countries still in the
early stages of development. The whole movement, however,
is incapable of interpretation in terms of the modern theory of
the business cycle; but must be regarded rather as the usual
accompaniment of growth—the systole and diastole of our
economic pulse. Leaving out of the calculation for the moment
the effect of good and bad seasons, the further the investigation
is pursued the stronger does the conviction become that these
phenomena are correlated results of one great dominant cause
that has always in Australian history played the leading part
in preparing the ground for the crop of financial and industrial
depression.
The first fact that demands consideration in such an investiga-
tion is the overwhelming importance of overseas trade to
Australia. This importance is explained by the geographical
situation of the continent, by the specialized nature of its
production, by the characteristics of its population, by its
political organization and especially by the nexus with Great
Britain, and, lastly, by the character of the economic structure
developed in the community. Even with a considerable variety
of soil and climate, and assuming a certain measure of success
4