Full text : The fiscal problem in Missouri

160 THE FISCAL PROBLEM IN MISSOURI

TaBLE 48: Motor VEemicLe REcisTraTIONS COMPARED
WitH THE NUMBER ASSESSED FOR THE GENERAL
ProrerTY TAX, BY CoUuNTIES, 1927 (continued)
Source: Data for Registrations from the Office of the Secretary of State

Countv

Cape Girardeau. ............ .
Carroll. ......oviviin an...
Carter. ....... A
Cass. ..... Sonia ¥
Coardrn .

Chariton. ;..
Christian. ....
Clark. .........
Clay. ......
Clinton

Cole. ....
Cooper. ....
Crawford. ...
Dade. ....
Dallas. |

Daviess. ......
De Kalb......
Dent. .....
Douglas. . ..
Dunklin. .

Franklin. .
Gasconade. . . .
Gentry. ...
Greene. .....
Grundv

Harrison.
Henry. ....
Hickory...
Holt. .....
Howard

Howell. . . :
ron.........coovvviiviii...
YACKSOM, 1.0 5 35 mers s 5 55 - ornee =
asper........
eferson

Number of
Registrat1onsl


6,550
4,360
598
4,961
1.889

4,048
2.297
2,527
5.912
3108

5,958
3,529
1,562
2117
1.508

2,963
2,498
1,607
1,176
1478

6,372
2.728
3,099
17,865
7962

4,060
5.022
1,054
3214
2.642
2,952
1,389
93,146
17 ars

Number
Assessed for
the General
Property
Tv?

6,152
2,323
489
3,018
1.428

2,436
1,873
1,292
3,316
1.977

4,497
2,793
636
1,530
1.058

1,908
1615
830
1,030
YEE,

4,375
2,140
1,765
9,175
1,645

2,758
3,563
908
1,553
(54
2124
i

29,47
nae

Ratio of
Number
Assessed to
Registration:
Per Centr

53.3
81.8
60.8
75.6

60.2
81.5
51.1
56.1
41.1

75.5
79.1
43.9
72.3
70.2

64.4
64.7
51.6
87.6
65.9

68.7
78.4
57.0
51.4
47 4

67.9
70.9
86.1
48.3
550

2.2
51.2
00

Average Assessed
 i
per Motor
Vehicle
Assessed?

22.1
123.00
153.22
141.25
104.25

106.52
111.00
112.68
153.22
155.81

120.64
122.00
98.13
131.89
110.00

101.86
104.96
115.83
98.99
107.20

143.41
128.54
163.24
193.95
117.70

128.13
152.26
102.84
151.26
122.98

140.42
115.70
245.97
161.92
25.83

1 For registration year 1927.
? Computed from valuation and average assessed value in Biennial Report of the
State Tax Commission, 1927-1928.
3 Data from Biennial Report of the State Tax Commission, 1927-1928, except
for those counties the valuation for which was changed by the State Board of
Equalization. The average value for the latter counties was recomputed.
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.