Full text : The fiscal problem in Missouri

TAX ADMINISTRATION

161

TaBLe 48: Motor VEHICLE REGISTRATIONS COMPARED
Wit THE NUMBER ASSESSED FOR THE (GENERAL
ProperTY TAX, BY CouNTiEs, 1927 (continued)
Source: Data for Registrations from the Office of the Secretary of State

County

johnson. ......
Knox..........-Laclede.
 .....
Lafayette. . ..
 AWTENCe .

Lewis. ..... :
Lincolm........ ..oocoii....
Linn... Cee
Livingston. .........oceevn...
McDonald. |

Macon. .
Madison. ... .
Maries. .
Marion. .
Mercer

Miller. ....
Mississippi. . . . . .
Moniteau . .
Monroe. .......
Montgomery. .

Morgan. ....... 2
New Madrid. ..................
Newton. ... SAE
Nodaway. . eee
Oregon. i

Osage. . .
Patho uaunisiean =
Pemiscot. ......
Perry.....
Pettis. .

Phelps. .
Pies cowie
Platte. ..
Polk. ...
Pulaski.

Number of
Registrational


5,172
2,450
2,368
6,243
1670

2,914
3.165
4,753
3.719
1°944

4,790
1,207
i178
6,542
1.894

2,083
1,844
2.383
2,930
2796

1,899
2,536
1,954
6,816
1.338

2,092
735
3,243
2.504
7 10.

2,347
3,696
) 750
2
481

Number
Assessed for
the General
Property
T or

4,008
1,362
1,384
3.716
2869

2,062
2,032
2,760
2,112
1.446

3,043
804
810
5,113
315

1,347
1,167
1,818
1851
ii

1,393
1,571
2,656
3,753
1.034

1,054
625
369
Q7Q

£90

Yi

Is

NAN

Ratio of
Number
Assessed to
Registrations
Vor Cont

led
55.6
58.4
59.5
82.8

70.8
64.2
58.1
56.8
74.4

63.5
66.6
68.8
78.2
4.1

64.7
63.3
76.3
62.5
12.1

73.4
61.9
53.6
55.1
77.3

50.4
85.0
42.2
cg,
oT

35.1
54 4

“ty -

' Average As.
sessed Value
per Motor
Vehicle
Acsesseds

$130.50
122.91
111.70
186.17
147.77

125.20
103.15
158.97
155.49
122.93

119,92
130.24
101.28
150.55
148.00

151.74
73.07
125.89
105.89
137.00

122.40
127.82
128.43
143.11
106.65

116.61
77.12
73.29
148.18
137.77

90.85
120.53
179.69
129.64
7 QN

L For registration year 1927,
2 Computed from valuation and average assessed value in Biennial Report of the
State Tax Commission, 1927-1928.
8 Data from Biennial Report of the State Tax Commission, 1927-1928, except
for those counties the valuation for which was changed by the State Board of
Equalization. The average value for the latter counties was recomputed.
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.