n34 
APPENDIX II. 
(58) Effect of daily limit. 
(59) Possibility of reduction in maxima. 
160) Intervals. 
(i) Existing practice— 
(a) In relation to fatigue. 
(6) In relation to workers’ meal times. 
(ii) Suitability of the law. 
(iii) Suitability of hours during which factory is working. 
‘iv) Number of holidays given. 
(61) Day of rest. 
(i) Existing practice. 
(ii) Suitability of the law. 
(62) Exempting provisions and the use made of them. 
B. Mines. 
(63) Hours worked per day and per week. 
(i) Normal, i.e. as determined by custom or agreement. 
(ii) Actual, 7.e. including overtime. 
(ili) Spreadover, 4.e. relation between hours worked and hours during 
which worker is on call. 
(64) Days worked per week. 
(65) Effect of restriction of hours. 
(i) On workers. 
(ii) On industry. 
(66) Possibility of reducing maxima. 
(67) Suitability of the law relating lo shifts. 
168) Possibility of introducing an effective daily limitation. 
(69) Intervals. 
(i) In relation to fatigue. 
(ii) In relation to workers’ meal times. 
(iii) Number of holidays given. 
(70) Day of rest. 
(71) Adequacy of existing provisions. 
(72) Exempting provisions and use made of them. 
C. Railways. 
(78) Hours worked per week and per day. 
(i) Normal, i.e. as determined by custom or agreement. 
(ii) Actual, i.e. including overtime. 
fii) Spreadover, i.e. relation between hours worked and hours during 
which worker is on call. 
(74) Days worked per week. 
715) Extent of application of International Labour Conventions relating to— 
(i) Hours, 
(ii) Rest days. 
Intervals— 
(i) In relation to fatigue, 
(ii) In relation to workers’ meal times. 
(iii) Number of holidays given, 
(77) Possibility of regulation. 
D, Other Establishments. 
(a) Plantations. 
(b) Docks, 
fe) Other industrial establishments. 
76)