596
Zu Buch TIT, Cap. 2,
2) Pars, I, S. 211: „Totationem enim rebus ipsis, quae ideo
tota vocantur, adscribimus, cum nobis et menti nostrae debeatur“
Vgl. P. I, 8 6, S. 230 ff.
%) A. a. O. P. 1,82. S. 215 ff.; bes. S. 218.
27) Näheres s. bei Trendelenburg, Gesch. der Kategorien-
lehre S. 23 ff.
2%) S. ob. Anm. 21. — Vgl. die Einleit. zu Pars I; S. 210.
%) Metaph. Peripatetica P. I, 8 1, S. 215.
3) S. Geulincx’ Ethica (1665) Tractat. I, Cap. IL Sect. II, 8 2.
Op. III, 33 ff. — Vgl. bes. die Annotata ad Ethicam Op. III, 205 ff.
3ı) S. z. B. Ethica a. a. O., Op. IN, 36 u. s.
32) S. Georges Lyon, L’Idealisme en Angleterre au XVIILe®
siecle, Paris 1888, S. 72 ff.
33) Vgl. über diese Schrift, die mir nicht zugänglich war:
Lyon, a. a. O0. 5. 74 ff.
*M) Da das Werk Burthogges so gut wie unbekannt ge-
blieben ist, füge ich die entscheidenden Belege hier vollständig
im Original hinzu: „As the Eye has no Perceivance of things but
under Colours, that are not in them (and the same, with due
alteration, must be said of the other Senses), so the Understan-
ding apprehends not things, or any Habitudes or Aspects of
them, but under Certain Notions, that neither have that being
in Objects, or that being of Objects, that they seem to have; but
are, in all respects, the very same to the mind or Understanding,
that Colours are to the Eye, and Sound to the Ear. To be more par-
ticular, the Understanding conceives not any thing but under the
Notion of an Entity, and this either a Substance or an Acci-
dent; Under that of a whole or a part; or of a Cause, or of
an Effect, or the like; and yet all these and the like are only
Entities of Reason conceived within the mind, that have no
more of any real true Existence without it, than Colours have
without the Eye or Sounds without the Ear ...,
It is certain that things to us Men are nothing but as they
do stand in our Analogy, that is, in plain terms, they are no-
thing to us but as they are known by us... In sum, the
immediate Objects of Cogitation, as it is exercised by men,
