Xxx1v.] OK THM TRENT AFFAIR. 3x53

thet the Emperor would be supported if he were to join 1861.
England in breaking up the blockade. France has a far Zr. 87.
greater stake in the export trade to the South than England,
owing to her old connexion with New Orleans.”
“ Midhurst, Dec. 14, 1861. (To M. Chevalier.)—There is
considerable reaction in the public mind, I think, on the
American question. Some large public meetings have passed
resolutions in favour of arbitration; and the religious congrogations
 have been also making demonstrations for peace.
I expect the Americans will propose either to restore the
status quo, and let the United States Admiralty Courts decide,
or else refer to arbitration. I hope the Emperor will offer
his mediation if an opportunity occurs. Neither party will
be in the humour to refuse. It is high time that we had a
revision of these so-called international maritime laws.
They are merely traps laid for nations to fall into wars.
I do not believe in a war. Palmerston likes to drive the
wheel close to the edge, and show how dexterously he can
avoid falling over the precipice. Meantime he keeps people’s
attention employed, which suits him politically. But Ihope
this game is nearly played out. Iam quite sick of it.”
“ Jan., 1862. (To Mr. Paulton.)—Palmerston ought to be
turned out for the reckless expense to which he has put us.
He and his colleagues knew there could be no war. From
the moment they were informed of the course France, Prussia,
and Austria were taking in giving us their moral support
(and they knew this early in December), a war was, as they
knew, impossible. Then came Seward’s despatch to Adams
on the 19th December, which virtually settled the matter.
To keep alive the wicked passions in this country as Palmerston
 and his Post did, was like the man. and that is the
worst that can be said of it.
«T can’t see my way through the American business.
don’t believe the North and South can ever lie in the same