Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

CHAP. 11] LEGAL BASIS 71 
the Executive Council. S. 33 provides: ‘No officer of 
the Government shall be bound to obey any order of the 
Governor involving any expenditure of public money : nor 
shall any warrant for the payment of money or any appoint- 
ment to or dismissal from office be valid except as herein 
provided, unless such order, warrant, appointment, or dis- 
missal shall be signed by the Governor, and countersigned 
by the Chief Secretary.” Ministers do not vacate their seats 
on accepting office. Provision is also made as usual for 
a Civil List, and for pensions to officers retiring on political 
grounds! Act No. 5 of 1873 altered the position slightly 
by providing that the Attorney-General need not be a 
political officer in the sense of being a member of Parliament, 
but he must hold office only as long as the Ministry of which 
he was a member held office. An additional minister was 
also added, to hold office on the same terms as the other 
ministers. Act No. 779 of 1901 provided, as an act of 
retrenchment on federation, that there should be only four 
officers who should bear such titles and fill such offices as 
the Governor might appoint. Act No. 959 of 1908 raised 
the number to six, one of whom should be an honorary 
minister, and not more than four of the ministers were 
to be at any one time members of the House of Assembly. 
The royal instructions recognize that some members of the 
Executive Council are so ex officio, but they do not limit 
the number, and the Chief Justice who administers the 
Government in the absence or incapacity of the Governor 
has a seat in that body. 
Even the moderate provisions of the Act of 1855-6 were 
criticized as being an undue effort to legislate on matters 
regarding the prerogative, but the Lieutenant-Governor, in 
reporting on the Bill}? stated that he was advised that the 
provisions were not illegal, and that it was for the Imperial 
Government to decide if they should be approved or not. 
No exception was expressed in respect of them by that 
Government. 
In the case of Tasmania, on the other hand, the absolute 
' See p. 70, note. + Purl. Pap., July 24, 1856, p. 68.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.