Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

1082 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART V 
immoral, or he is a pauper, or he has some other objection 
which can be defined in an Act of Parliament, and by which 
the exclusion can be managed with regard to all those whom 
you really desire to exclude. 
He then reiterated his approval of the Natal principle, and 
invited the adoption of a settlement which would spare the 
feelings of the Indian subjects of the Queen while protecting 
the Colonies from any invasion of the class to whom they 
would justly object. 
The Conference ended without a definite settlement, but 
the report expressed confidence that a solution on the lines 
indicated was possible. 
The Natal Act No. 1 of 1897 referred to in the speech by 
Mr. Chamberlain embodied the principle of a test of writing in 
a Huropean language an application for admission in a pre- 
scribed form, as well as excluding paupers, idiots, diseased per- 
sons, criminals, and prostitutes, and it was held up to approval 
also as regards the question of Japanese susceptibilities in a 
dispatch of October 20, 1897, from Mr. Chamberlain to the 
Australian Colonies, which was published in Australia! In 
it he said that M. Kato, the Japanese Minister, would be 
satisfied by the exclusion of Japanese by a language test, 
and the same principle might well be adopted with regard 
to Indians. Western Australia legislated in 1897 (No. 13) 
on these lines. New South Wales proceeded to adopt this 
principle in 1898 (No. 3), the Bill being restricted to the 
writing test by the Legislative Council, and Tasmania did 
so in 1898 (No. 69), while New Zealand adopted a similar 
Act (No. 33) in the next year. In Victoria the two Houses 
disagreed, and nothing was done. But in 1900, according to 
a return given to the House of Commons? no restrictions had 
been adopted in South Australia, in Victoria, or in Western 
Australia, except that a special Act of 1897 provided for 
the introduction of indentured labour, and in Queensland 
there were certain minor restrictions? On the coming into 
' Commonwealth Parl. Pap., 1901, No. 41. 
Parl. Pap., H. C, 393, Sess. 2, 1900. 
The franchise was not given for the Assembly except for a freehold
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.