THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
196
Origen. I visited at St. Petersburg, near the corn-market, a
street almost exclusively inhabited by small bankers belonging
to this eccentric sect. The determination, the self-forgetful
ness, the audacity of the Nihilists, compared with whose con
spiracies the plots of Carbonarism are merely child’s play, are
a fact so foreign to our nature that we can hardly understand it
Yet it is with these sentiments, which seem so contrary to nature,
that Bakunin has succeeded in inspiring his partisans, as well in
western countries as in his native land. Is it not strange that
this Muscovite, whose intelligence and learning are by no
means remarkable, should have succeeded in originating a
movement of ideas which plays so important a rôle in the
march of contemporary events? Not only is he the father of
Nihilism in Russia, but he has been the apostle of International
Anarchic Socialism throughout the south of Europe, and it is
the substance of his doctrines that we meet in those of the
Paris Revolution of the i8th of March.
Michael Bakunin was born in 1814, in the government of
Twer, near Moscow. His family belongs to the Russian aris
tocracy. One of his uncles had been an ambassador under
Catherine II., and he was cousin by marriage of the General
Muravieff, whom the Poles call “ the hangman of Poland.’
He studied at the School of Artillery in St. Petersburg, and
entered the service as an officer. Quartered with his battery
in the Polish provinces, the sight of the régime of absolute
repression to which these provinces were subjected filled his
heart with the hatred of despotism. He resigned his com
mission and went to reside at Moscow, where he studied
philosophy with Belinski. Towards 1846 he went to Germany,
where Hegelian ideas captivated him, and he threw himself
into the extreme left of that school of thought in which a
powerful revolutionary leaven was then fermenting. In 1847
he went to Paris, where he met George Sand and 1 roudhon ;
but he was soon expelled from France, probably on account of
the violence of his speeches. Returning to Germany, he took
an active part in the insurrections which at that time burst forth
in many places, and in the spring of 1849 he was one of the
leaders of the rising at Dresden, when the revolutionary party