fullscreen: error

1086 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART V 
strangers to the Commonwealth have been facilitated by an 
informal arrangement with India and J apan made in 1904.1 
A reserved Bill (No. 85) of 1910 of New Zealand raises 
very serious questions. It provides that in the case of 
vessels trading or plying from the Dominion to the Common- 
wealth a duty of twenty-five per cent. of the passage money 
and freight shall be levied on contracts in respect of pas- 
sengers and goods conveyed by ships which have natives of 
Asia among the crew, unless indeed such ships pay the New 
Zealand rate of wages to their crews. The latter provision 
could not legally be enforced directly, as it would be ultra 
vires the New Zealand Parliament, but the former provision 
is not ultra wires, but is directly anti-Asiatic, and avowedly 
aimed at Asiatics, as stated in the Parliamentary Debates, 
and at the discussion at the Imperial Conference.? 
With the State Governments since federation the trouble 
has been the insertion in Acts of small differentiations against 
Asiatics eo nomine. In some cases the Imperial Government 
has succeeded in having changes made in such Acts. In 
1900 Queensland passed a Bill to amend the Sugar Works 
Guarantee Acts, 1893-5, which contained an anti-Asiatic 
section, and which the Imperial Government declined to 
assent to, on a protest from Japan. Queensland in 1903 
(No. 15) extended to all aliens a discrimination in an Act 
(No. 13) of the preceding year against Asiatics in the matter 
of the granting of agricultural advances, and in other legisla~ 
tion in 1904 (No. 18) and 1910 (No. 9) has adopted the language 
test as a ground of regulation. Tn 1908 the Upper House of 
Victoria cut out clauses against Asiatics in a Factory Act as 
unjust and improper; in 1909, by a free use of the name of 
the Imperial Government, the Government of New South 
Wales secured the restriction to Chinese of certain provisions 
in an Act regarding factories; in 1907 the Government of 
New Zealand made changes in a Factory Act in order to 
avoid reservation under the instructions to the Governor ; 
but on the other hand, Western Australia has passed several 
* Commonwealth Parl. Pap., 1905, No. 61. 
* Cf. Parl. Pap., Cd. 5745, pp. 395 seq. ; below, pp. 1211-5.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.