UNEMPLOYMENT IN THE UNITED STATES 137
lice
nes
mn.
hed
fit.
18%
er,
led
~al
"VY,
in
as.
16
ns
er,
On
ld
to
8,
1g
m
he
ne
er
in
at
1e
F
y
0
[
and reported favorably by that committee—the Labor Committee—
that is, the measure providing for the collection of unemployment
statistics and the dissemination of information, and so forth, could
be used, possibly with some slight amendment, to produce that
voluntary cooperation among State and private employment agencies
that would be desirable and would improve their efficiency.
I see no reason why that should not be done. Nobody objects to
the Federal Government producing and disseminating all the infor-
mation with reference to commerce, trade, manufactures in this
country that it is possible to get. Information of facts never does
anybody any harm and certainly there is no constitutional or other
objection to the Federal Government doing that and with the facts
before them, the solution of the particular problems can be taken up
by the local bodies concerned.
But this bill provides that—and I think it is a grave feature of this
bill that has not been brought to your attention; I am reading from
the third section——
Mr. Moxtacue. What bill?
Mr. CADWALADER. S. 3060: at line 23, on page 2.
The bureau shall also assist in coordinating the public employment offices
throughout the country by furnishing and publishing information as to oppor-
tunities for employment, * * *—
so far so good—
by maintaining a system for clearing labor between the several States, by estab-
lishing and maintaining uniform standards, policies, and procedure—
note particularly that ‘uniform standards, policies and procedure ’’—
and by aiding in the transportation of workers to such places as may be deemed
necessary, for the purpose of obtaining employment.
Mr. Tucker. Are you reading from page 2?
Mr. CapwALADER. Pages 2 and 3 of S. 3060. And then comes
the pious wish.
. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress that the service author-
ized by this act shall be impartial. neutral in labor disputes, and free from political
influence.
It might as well have said that it was then the policy of Congress
that this service should be thoroughly well administered. I should
take it for granted that all those things were in the policy of Congress.
I do not see that those words add much to the bill.
But consider this: The director of the United States Employment
Service created by this bill is to have a dictatorial power over the State
employment agencies, because he can simply say, “You do not get this
money unless you do the thing the way I want it done.” That is the
whole purpose and the main objection to this bill. - : : -
Now, suppose there is a very grave state of unemployment in the
textile industries, we will say, of Massachusetts; as we know there is.
At the same time there is a fair condition of industry in the textile
interests of the Carolinas. Would it be competent for this director to
establish a uniform policy of moving out of work operatives from Fall
River to Spartanburg? There they would come in competition with
the native labor. Would that please the people of Spartanburg?
Would not the United States Government be getting itself into pretty
hot water if it undertook to pursue any such uniform policy?