THE NOTION OF MONEY 177
held to possess an “intrinsic” value and its position as a
standard metal is ascribed to this circumstance.
The truth is that the value of gold only remains constant
when it is transported from one monometallist-gold country to
another. Its value is maintained, ~fter it has ceased to be legal
currency, only because it enters another country where the
system cof free coin=ge and the fact that the monetary unit is
defined in terms of a given weight of gold will also make it
legal tender currency corresponding to that in the first
country owing to the definition of the two units (metallic
par). Ultimately there is nothing more than this in its
so-called “commercial” rate; the proof is that in a country
which possesses a fiduciary circulation convertible into
gold but where the export of gold (e.g., Switzerland,
Spain, etc.) or its import (e.g., Sweden) are prohibited, a
constant ratio of value between its gold currency and foreign
gold ceases to exist. On the other hand, it is true that gold
is the basis of the monetary system in every mono-
metallist-gold country, and other currencies are only held
to have value in so far as they are convertible into gold.
But the sole reason for this is that gold currency is the only
one which is also legal tender currency in a large number of
other countries and ensures stable exchanges with them, a
situation which, as we have just observed, only arises
when gold can be freely imported and exported.
Moreover, it should not be assumed that a monetary
system which involves the use of a precious metal neces-
sarily rests on a metal basis. Spain, for instance, from the
end of the 19th century until the outbreak of war only had
a circulation of notes and silver écus, with an abundant
supply of the latter. Nevertheless the Spanish exchange
was never, during this period, governed by fluctuations
in silver, and, although notes were in practice convertible
into silver écus, they did not derive their value from these
écus which were worth much more than the metal. The
measure of values, i.e., the standard in Spain, was the peseta,
whether it was embodied in silver or paper, and the value of
the peseta in relation to foreign currencies varied irregu-
larly but independently of the “intrinsic” value of the