GENERAL INTRODUCTION

n of
nost
Son
-etahas

.0S0-shy.

an a

.y in
ural
rerse
own
tion
isive
disslop-



and
the
says
lizaure.

otamel


rical
that
r obnon-


the
scl

ences against metaphysical encroachments. On the other
hand, he pointed out that no social science is purely empirical,
 that it differentiates its subject-matter from the
actuality on the basis of a specific category of cognition
and shapes its data in forms which are themselves not empirically
 obtained from investigations within that science.
It was out of these critical inquiries into the presuppositions
 of the social sciences that he developed his formulation
 of the task and the scope of a study of sociology and
its legitimation as an empirical science,
If it may be said that Kant’s critical philosophy is a
conciliation between rationalism and empiricism, then
Simmel’s critical philosophy is a similar conciliation between
 two divergent tendencies in his own special field.
The divergent tendencies existing in Simmel’s time in the
field of the social sciences were the tendency to claim exclusive
 validity for the historical method and the tendency
to claim exclusive validity for the naturalistic method.
Simmel’s philosophy is a conciliation. He points out that
a complete understanding of the socio-historical actuality
requires both methods of approach, that they are mutually
 supporting and presuppose each other.
Simmel started from Kant. Like Kant’s, his philosophy
is relativistic. Like Kant, he distinguishes sharply between
 subject and object, between knowing mind and
known world, between the organizing functions of the
mind and the data of experience, between form and matter.
 But Simmel’s relativism is much less rigid than the
Kantian formalism. It is less purely intellectualistic, is
more elastic and flexible, and therefore wider in scope and
more comprehensive. It is a functional, a dynamic, a genetic
 relativism. His epistemological relativism is not primarily
 in terms of form and content, but in terms of process
 and raw material. The product, knowledge, is a func-