INVESTMENT OF FUNDS
115
large a number of banks would in time of stress
be of decided disadvantage to the Federal reserve
system, which seeks as much as possible to mobilize
the financial resources of the country under
one control. The bill which I now return repeals
that provision so far as it might apply to funds
accumulated in the hands of the Government under
the postal savings system. It is in this provision
of the bill that I find myself unable to concur.
“It is my clear conviction, very respectfully
urged and submitted, that as a matter of principle
as well as of policy we should strengthen and
safeguard the new banking system very jealously
with a view to the ultimate unification of the entire
banking system of the country under the
supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. It
would, in my judgment, be a grave mistake to
take away any of the benefits or advantages held
out by the present law to member banks to enter
the system, and to take them away just as the
system is about to be put into operation and the
promises of the act of last December made good
to the banks that have entered.”
A year and a half later, on May 18, 1916, the
Postal Savings Amendment act was passed,
which contained a compromise between the positions
on this subject taken in the bill previously