64 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS
TABLE 31.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE
AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Excluding capital charges]
Cost per ton
aeg than—
B00. ice cm mm me Bm
AO eee
1 ee mm ccmmmm—en
oe.
r
¢
vo
ll
bee
290.01
Farms
Number | Per cent |
2
19
59
1:
0.4
4.0
12.3
23.6 |
35.4
50.8
52.1
I
2%"
-
Acres
Number
Per cent
20.0
282.0
1,004. 5
1,948.1
2,853. 6
», 799. 4
545.4
06. 4
08.4
0.4
4.2
16.3
29.0
42.5 |
RR, 6
7.7
~.0
3.8
“3.1
1.3
4
9
0.7
7
dav
Tons
Number | Per cent
466.0
4, 577.8
16,393. 4
29,740. 6
42,112. 2
55,393. 5
23,002. 7
1,713.2
77,921.4
10,908. 1
"7 875.
4, 711. £
5, 657. &
4,072.4
’, 705.
2 850. 2
010.1
247. §
348. F
425.4
614.8
714. 1
764. }
"90. €
6.1
R7. 848. 1
0.5
5.2
18.7
33.8
47.9
63.1
74.0
81.6
88.7
22.1
04.3
96.4
97.5
£0
“8.%
"9
9.1
0a. 2
09.4
99.5
99."
$9. .
99.9
99.9
99.9
100. ©
TasLE 32.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
UTAH, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 478 FARMS IN THE THREE
AREAS INVESTIGATED
{Land charges on net cash rental basis and interest on other capital at 6 per cent]
[Including capital charges]
Cost per ton
Less tr>n—
A. Yemen mmmremmmmnn mmm
oo.
i
Ee ee re ef. ro. ms 6
oe I
Number ' Per cent
1
¢
20
4¢
~
14°
201
250
+3
0.2
.6
4.2
10.0
I>
coy
ge.
90
99.4
09. 6
99. §
100. ¢
47 4
478
Acres
Number Per cent |
32.0
54.0
212.0
333.5
£98. 5
AT
0.8
.&
R.2
12.4
ee
30.5
5 "05.3
6,708.3
6.716. 3
5.
59. ¢
09, ¢
100. f
Tons
Number Per cent
384.0
717.0
3,704.4
i2, 803.0
"4, 651. §
3, 671.1
12,163. (
408.7
30.6
76.4
09, ¢
929. ¢
. 458.4
357.
,699.
= 770."
"289.
254.
487."
£44
14
0.4
.8
4.2
14.6
28.1
41.7
54.8
64. 2
73 1
82.8
87.9
91.0
93.0
04.9
96 4
97.6
rc
dA
08.
08.9
99.1
99, 2
or 7
£7
¢.
9g.
99.9
100.0
100. 0
J2.
5.
L532.
764.
37,790. 1
37, 812. 4
37 848. 1